Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 38
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 38, § 1303 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 387 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 78, §208 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 383, §2 (RPR). PL 1979, c. 663, §§234,235 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 699, §§3-8 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 430, §§1-5 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 470, §A170 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 478, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 528, §1 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 342, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 432, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 743, §15 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 822, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 517, §6 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 769, §A181 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 787, §16 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 124, §1 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 585, §E3 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1990–2006 · leading case: Sawyer Env't Recovery Facilities, Inc. v. Town of Hampden, 2000 ME 179 (Me. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sawyer Env't Recovery Facilities, Inc. v. Town of Hampden, 2000 ME 179 (Me. 2000). “Title 38 M.R.S.A. § 1303 (11 — B)(1989) formerly defined "substantial expansion of a commercial landfill facility” as "an expansion of an existing licensed commercial waste facility by more than 50%, as measured by either volume of waste or land area affected, whichever is more…”
Smith v. Town of Pittston, 2003 ME 46 (Me. 2003). “” See 38 M.R.S.A. § 1303 — C(12). Dumping is not at issue here because, to the extent that dumping means something different than spreading, Smith did not propose to dump septage.”
We The People v. Bd. of Env't Prot. (Me. Super. Ct 2006). “38 MRSA § 1303- C(6)(D). The SPO took ownershp and proprietorshp of the West Old Town Landfill in 2003, and entered into a contract with Casella to manage the facility on its behalf.”
Schroeder v. Dep't of Env't Prot. (Me. Super. Ct 2006). “38 MRSA § 1303- C(6)(D). The SPO took ownershp and proprietorshp of the West Old Town Landfill in 2003, and entered into a contract with Casella to manage the facility on its behalf.”
State v. Botelho, 568 A.2d 1102 (Me. 1990). “” 38 M.R.S.A. § 1303(10) (1989). Our review of the record persuades us that the Superior Court committed no abuse of discretion in finding that the State had established “a clear likelihood of success on the merits.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 38, § 1303(10) — 1 case
State v. Botelho, 568 A.2d 1102 (Me. 1990). “” 38 M.R.S.A. § 1303(10) (1989). Our review of the record persuades us that the Superior Court committed no abuse of discretion in finding that the State had established “a clear likelihood of success on the merits.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.