Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 38
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 38, § 569 (2026)

Ground Water Oil Clean-up Fund

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 496, §A14 (NEW). PL 1985, c. 626, §§9,10 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 746, §24 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 278 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 491, §§16-21 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 521, §11 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 769, §A177 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 502, §B60 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 543, §6 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 865, §§16,24,25 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 890, §§A40,B147- 150 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 66, §§A29-31,C1 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 433, §§4-6 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 433, §7 (AFF). PL 1991, c. 439, §6 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 494, §§13,14 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 817, §25 (RP). PL 1997, c. 374, §14 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1988–1992 · leading case: Patrons Oxford Mut. Ins. v. Marois, 573 A.2d 16 (Me. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Patrons Oxford Mut. Ins. v. Marois, 573 A.2d 16 (Me. 1990). · cites it 4× “Alternatively, third parties could make a claim against the State for damages they suffer from the migration of contaminated ground water and the State could then sue landowners like the Maroises for reimbursement, 38 M.R.S.A. § 569(2-A) (1989). That also has not occurred in…”
Demello v. Dep't of Env't Prot., 611 A.2d 985 (Me. 1992). · cites it 2× “Contrary to the argument of the DEP, 38 M.R.S.A. § 569 does not prohibit the application of Rule 15(c) by analogy.”
H.E.P. Dev. Grp., Inc. v. Nelson, 606 A.2d 774 (Me. 1992). “See 38 M.R.S.A. § 569(2-A) (Supp.1991). 2 . HEP sold portions of the property but has been unable to sell the remaining seventy acres.”
Sirois v. Winslow, 585 A.2d 183 (Me. 1991). · cites it 2× “865, § 16, effective July 1, 1990 under an emergency preamble, repealed the exclusivity provision contained in the Underground Oil Storage Facilities and Ground Water Protection Act, 38 M.R.S.A. § 569(2-A)(E), and added a new provision, § 569(2-A)(G), expressly declaring that…”
Brown v. Dep't of Env't Prot., 549 A.2d 1138 (Me. 1988). · cites it 2× “These amendments, set forth in 38 M.R.S.A. §§ 569(2-A) and (3) (Supp.1987), are inapplicable to the instant case.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 38, § 569(2)(C): 1 case
Demello v. Dep't of Env't Prot., 611 A.2d 985 (Me. 1992). “Contrary to the argument of the DEP, 38 M.R.S.A. § 569 does not prohibit the application of Rule 15(c) by analogy.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 38, § 569(6): 1 case
Patrons Oxford Mut. Ins. v. Marois, 573 A.2d 16 (Me. 1990). “Alternatively, third parties could make a claim against the State for damages they suffer from the migration of contaminated ground water and the State could then sue landowners like the Maroises for reimbursement, 38 M.R.S.A. § 569(2-A) (1989). That also has not occurred in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.