Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 83 (2026)

Rehabilitation services

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 372, §A29 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 779, §4 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 580, §9 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 615, §§D11,12 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1989–1995 · leading case: Ayotte v. United Servs., Inc., 567 A.2d 430 (Me. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ayotte v. United Servs., Inc., 567 A.2d 430 (Me. 1989). “(Emphasis added) 39 M.R.S.A. § 83(7) makes identical provision for representation of the employee at any stage of the rehabilitation process prior to an appeal under section 88, but has no relevance on the facts of the present case.”
Cook v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc., 659 A.2d 287 (Me. 1995). “Aside from section 110, Title 39 authorizes the award of attorney fees to the employee for services rendered in the rehabilitation process, 39 M.R.S.A. § 83 (1989), repealed and replaced by P.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 83(7) — 1 case
Ayotte v. United Servs., Inc., 567 A.2d 430 (Me. 1989). “(Emphasis added) 39 M.R.S.A. § 83(7) makes identical provision for representation of the employee at any stage of the rehabilitation process prior to an appeal under section 88, but has no relevance on the facts of the present case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.