Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 4, § 651 (2026)

Appointment and duties; salary and expenses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 512, §1 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 470, §1 (AMD). P&SL 1969, c. 197, §D2 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 203 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 480 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 590, §4 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 382 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 505 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 578 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 599, §3 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 788, §7 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 383, §11 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 408, §§27,27-A (AMD). PL 1975, c. 430, §20 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 208, §1 (RPR). PL 1981, c. 647, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 152 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 528, §E2 (RP). PL 1991, c. 528, §RRR (AFF). PL 1991, c. 591, §E2 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–1980 · leading case: State v. Smith, 415 A.2d 553 (Me. 1980).
State v. Smith, 415 A.2d 553 (Me. 1980). “(Emphasis added) The emphasized language was added in 1977, subsequent to our decision in State v. Taylor, Me., 343 A.2d 11, 21 (1975), when section 651 was repealed and replaced by P.”
State v. Farris, 420 A.2d 928 (Me. 1980). · cites it 2× “Prior to the amendment, in 1977, of 4 M.R.S.A. § 651 by P.L.1977 c. 208 § 1, it was entirely within the discretion of the presiding justice whether to grant, or deny, a motion that the closing arguments of counsel be recorded.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.