Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 5
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 17705 (2026)

Refund of accumulated contributions

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 801, §§5,7 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 256, §6 (RPR). PL 1987, c. 739, §§18,48 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 619, §§7-9 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 619, §18 (AFF). PL 1993, c. 387, §§A8,9 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 651, §5 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 630, §B3 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 137, §10 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–2008 · leading case: Spiller v. State, 627 A.2d 513 (Me. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Spiller v. State, 627 A.2d 513 (Me. 1993). · cites it 2× “5 M.R.S.A. § 17705(2) (1989 & Supp.1992); see 5 M.”
Parker v. Wakelin, 123 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1997). “5 M.R.S.A. § 17705(2). An eligible retiree earns a pension in the amount of two percent of his or her “average final compensation” multiplied by the number of years of total creditable public service (up to 25 years).”
Parker v. Wakelin, 937 F. Supp. 46 (D. Me. 1996). “5 M.R.S.A. § 17705(2). In 1993, in order to lower the State’s budget allocation for its contribution to the fund, legislators enacted certain amendments to the Maine Plan.”
Bates v. Bd. Of Trs., No. KENcv-07-292 (Me. Super. Ct Oct. 9, 2008). “" 5 M.R.S. § 17705. Nothing in the plain language of this provision limits the MSRS's ability to transfer a member placed in an incorrect retirement plan.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 17705(2): 3 cases
Spiller v. State, 627 A.2d 513 (Me. 1993). “5 M.R.S.A. § 17705(2) (1989 & Supp.1992); see 5 M.”
Parker v. Wakelin, 123 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1997). “5 M.R.S.A. § 17705(2). An eligible retiree earns a pension in the amount of two percent of his or her “average final compensation” multiplied by the number of years of total creditable public service (up to 25 years).”
Parker v. Wakelin, 937 F. Supp. 46 (D. Me. 1996). “5 M.R.S.A. § 17705(2). In 1993, in order to lower the State’s budget allocation for its contribution to the fund, legislators enacted certain amendments to the Maine Plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.