Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.2681

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN RENAISSANCE ZONE ACT


Act 376 of 1996


125.2681 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Michigan renaissance zone act".

History: 1996, Act 376, Imd. Eff. July 17, 1996

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of Michigan strategic fund from department of management and budget to department of labor and economic growth, see E.R.O. No. 2003-1, compiled at MCL 445.2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2008–2015 · leading case: Lafarge Midwest, Inc. v. City of Detroit
Lafarge Midwest, Inc. v. City of Detroit (2010) michctapp · cites it 4× “Petitioner filed a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal, challenging the tax on the ground that the property was subject to the Michigan Renaissance Zone Act (RZA), MCL 125.2681 et seq., and exempt from this school debt service tax.”
Kinder Morgan Michigan, LLC v. City of Jackson (2008) michctapp “It is undisputed that the plant is situated in a renaissance zone, established pursuant to Michigan’s Renaissance Zone Act, MCL 125.2681 et seq. The Fire Fighters and Eolice Officers Retirement Act, 1937 FA 345, MCL 38.”
Graphic Packaging Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attor (2015) texapp · cites it 2× “(1) A taxpayer that is a business located and conducting business activity within a renaissance zone may claim a credit against the tax imposed by this act for the tax year to the extent and for the duration provided pursuant to the Michigan renaissance zone act, 1996 PA 376 ,…”
Lafarge Midwest Inc v. City of Detroit (2011) mich “However, I write separately to indicate that I would have reversed the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissent had the Legislature not amended the renaissance zone act, MCL 125.2681 et seq., after that court released its opinion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.