Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 141.161 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE UNLIMITED TAX ELECTION ACT

Act 189 of 1979

141.161 Short title.

Sec. 1.

This act shall be known and may be cited as "the unlimited tax election act".

History: 1979, Act 189, Imd. Eff. Dec. 21, 1979

Compiler's Notes:

Former MCL 141.161, pertaining to acquisition and financing of city parking facilities, was repealed by Act 71 of 1957.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1952–1957 · leading case: Shizas v. City of Detroit, 52 N.W.2d 589 (Mich. 1952).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Shizas v. City of Detroit, 52 N.W.2d 589 (Mich. 1952). “* CL 1948, §141.161 et seq. (Stat Ann 1949 Rev § 5.2426[1] et seq.”

City of Detroit v. Wayne Circuit Judges, 62 N.W.2d 626 (Mich. 1954). “But see CL 1948, § 141.161 [Stat Ann 1949 Rev .§ 5.-2426(1)].”

Thomson v. City of Dearborn, 85 N.W.2d 122 (Mich. 1957). · cites it 2× “the county of taxes needed for public purposes; that it thereby also illegally increased the tax burden on the plaintiffs and others; that it had proceeded contrary to the city charter, which requires public lands to be included in such a special assessment district; that no…”

Thomson v. City of Dearborn, 83 N.W.2d 329 (Mich. 1957). “The question remaining is whether the exemption so granted by said section 7 has subsequently been withdrawn from city-owned lands used for the kind of public purpose here involved by the provision of section 1 of PA 1947, No 286 (CL 1948, § 141.161 [Stat Ann 1949 Rev §…”

McVeigh v. City of Jackson, 56 N.W.2d 231 (Mich. 1953). “The defendants contend, and the trial court so held, that no such appropriation is necessary since *398 the statute (CL 1948, § 141.161 [Stat Ann 1949 Rev § 5.2426(1)]), provides that a city may acquire and operate parking,facilities.”

Stolorow v. City of Pontiac, 63 N.W.2d 611 (Mich. 1954). “The city of Pontiac is authorized by State law (PÁ 1947, No 286 [CL 1948, § 141.161 et seq. (Stat Ann § 5.2426[1] et seg.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.