Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 141 / Act 118 of 1923
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 141.61a (2026)

Constructing, equipping, or making alterations in public buildings; authorization of expenditures.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS BY COUNTIES


Act 118 of 1923


141.61a Constructing, equipping, or making alterations in public buildings; authorization of expenditures.

Sec. 1a.

    The county board of commissioners without submitting the same to the vote of the electors may authorize annually the expenditure of any funds on hand not raised by taxation for the purpose of constructing, equipping, or making alterations in any of the public buildings in the county if the county board of commissioners shall by resolution of a majority of the total membership of the board authorize the same.

History: Add. 1941, Act 282, Eff. Jan. 10, 1942 ;-- CL 1948, 141.61a ;-- Am. 1957, Act 186, Imd. Eff. June 4, 1957 ;-- Am. 1973, Act 123, Imd. Eff. Aug. 21, 1973 ;-- Am. 1975, Act 162, Imd. Eff. July 14, 1975

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1959–1974 · leading case: Alan v. Wayne Cnty., 200 N.W.2d 628 (Mich. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alan v. Wayne Cnty., 200 N.W.2d 628 (Mich. 1972). · cites it 4× “[60] See trial exhibit 10. [61] See trial exhibit 10.”
Oakland Cnty. Taxpayers' League v. Oakland Cnty. Supervisors, 94 N.W.2d 875 (Mich. 1959). · cites it 2× “PA 1923, No 118, § 1a, as amended (CL 1948, § 141.61a, as amended [Stat Ann 1958 Rev § 5.”
Kyes v. Allegan Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 221 N.W.2d 449 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 4× “This issue turns upon the proper construction of MCLA 141.61a; MSA 5.2251(1) which reads: "The board of commissioners without submitting the same to the vote of the electors shall have the right or power to authorize annually the expenditure of any funds on hand not raised by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.