Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 28 / Act 256 of 2011
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.451 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN FIREWORKS SAFETY ACT


Act 256 of 2011


28.451 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Michigan fireworks safety act".

History: 2011, Act 256, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2024 · leading case: Arjoann Elias Zedan v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arjoann Elias Zedan v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Zedan then attempted to appeal the decision to the Michigan Administrative Hearing System (MAHS), but her appeal was rejected as untimely.”
Arjoann Elias Zedan v. Dept of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Zedan then attempted to appeal the decision to the Michigan Administrative Hearing System (MAHS), but her appeal was rejected as untimely.”
Z&Z Fireworks v. City of Roseville (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “In this action alleging preemption of a local ordinance by the Michigan Fireworks Safety Act (MFSA), MCL 28.451 et seq., plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant and denying summary disposition to plaintiff.”
Z&Z Fireworks v. City of Roseville (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “In this action alleging preemption of a local ordinance by the Michigan Fireworks Safety Act (MFSA), MCL 28.451 et seq., plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant and denying summary disposition to plaintiff.”
David Samona v. the City of Eastpointe Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “The trial court invalidated the challenged ordinances as conflicting with provisions of the Michigan Fireworks Safety Act (FSA), MCL 28.451 et seq. Eastpointe appeals as of right, arguing that MCL 28.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.