Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 287.951 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PRIVATELY OWNED CERVIDAE PRODUCERS MARKETING ACT

Act 190 of 2000

287.951 Short title.

Sec. 1.

This act shall be known and may be cited as the "privately owned cervidae producers marketing act".

History: 2000, Act 190, Eff. June 1, 2001

Compiler's Notes:

For transfer of certain powers and duties under the cervidae act from the department of agriculture, or its director, to the department of natural resources by type II transfer, see E.R.O. No. 2004-2, compiled at MCL 287.981.

For transfer of powers and duties of department of natural resources to department of natural resources and environment, and abolishment of department of natural resources, see E.R.O. No. 2009-31, compiled at MCL 324.99919.

For transfer of powers and duties of department of natural resources and environment to department of natural resources, see E.R.O. No. 2011-1, compiled at MCL 324.99921.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2018 · leading case: Twp. of Fraser v. Harvey Haney, 932 N.W.2d 239 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Twp. of Fraser v. Harvey Haney, 932 N.W.2d 239 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “2 Defendant Harvey Haney was previously sued by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in 2015 under the Privately Owned Cervidae Producers Marketing Act (POC Act), MCL 287.951 et seq ., when it was discovered that he improperly registered his private cervidae (deer)…”

Ranch Rheaume LLC v. Dep't of Agric. (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “Defendants classified plaintiff’s facility as having a high risk of CWD infections because, among other things, it did not comply with certain provisions of MCL 287.951 et seq., which regulates the operation of privately owned elk-breeding facilities in Michigan.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.