Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.17014 (2026)

Repealed. 2023, Act 209, Eff. Feb. 13, 2024.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLIC HEALTH CODE


Act 368 of 1978


333.17014 Repealed. 2023, Act 209, Eff. Feb. 13, 2024.

    Repealed. 2023, Act 209, Eff. Feb. 13, 2024.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to legislative findings regarding the enactment of measures favoring childbirth over abortion.

PopularName Notes:

Act 368

PopularName Notes:

Informed Consent
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1996–2016 · leading case: People of Michigan v. William Little, 499 Mich. 332 (Mich. 2016).
People of Michigan v. William Little, 499 Mich. 332 (Mich. 2016). · cites it 8× “39 See also MCL 333.17014 (stating that certain informed consent statutes are designed to provide “objective, truthful information”); MCL 400.”
Mahaffey v. Attorney Gen., 564 N.W.2d 104 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “[MCL 333.17014; MSA 14.15(17014).] The act was signed by the Governor on July 28, 1993, and scheduled to take effect on April 1, 1994.”
People v. Higuera, 625 N.W.2d 444 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “[4] MCL 333.17014; MSA 14.15(17014), M.C.L. § 333.”
Taylor v. Kurapati, 600 N.W.2d 670 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 333.17014(f) and (h); MSA 14.15(17014)(f) and (h).”
Blair v. Hutzel Hosp., 552 N.W.2d 507 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “§ 333.17014(f) and (h); M.S.A. § 14.15(17014)(f) and (h).”
People of Michigan v. Nevin Hughes (Mich. 2016). · cites it 4× “39 See also MCL 333.17014 (stating that certain informed consent statutes are designed to provide “objective, truthful information”); MCL 400.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.17014(f) — 2 cases
Taylor v. Kurapati, 600 N.W.2d 670 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “§ 333.17014(f) and (h); MSA 14.15(17014)(f) and (h).”
Blair v. Hutzel Hosp., 552 N.W.2d 507 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “§ 333.17014(f) and (h); M.S.A. § 14.15(17014)(f) and (h).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.