Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 333 / Act 368 of 1978
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.7218 (2026)

Schedule 4; controlled substances included.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLIC HEALTH CODE


Act 368 of 1978


333.7218 Schedule 4; controlled substances included.

Sec. 7218.

    (1) The following controlled substances are included in schedule 4:

    (a) Any material, compound, mixture, or preparation containing any quantity of the following substances having a potential for abuse associated with a depressant effect on the central nervous system, including their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers if the existence of the salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation:

    

    Barbital

    Flurazepam

    Chloral Betaine

    Lorazepam

    Chloral Hydrate

    Mebutamate

    Chlordiazepoxide

    Meprobamate

    Clonazepam

    Methohexital

    Clorazepate

    Methylphenobarbital

    Dextropropoxyphene

    Oxazepam

    Diazepam

    Paraldehyde

    Ethchlorvynol

    Petrichloral

    Ethinamate

    Phenobarbital

    Flunitrazepam

    Prazepam

    (b) Any material, compound, mixture, or preparation containing any quantity of the following substances having a potential for abuse associated with an effect on the central nervous system, including their salts, optical, positional, or geometric isomers, and salts of the isomers if the existence of the salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible.

    Fenfluramine

    (c) Any material, compound, mixture, or preparation containing any quantity of the following substances having a potential for abuse associated with a stimulant effect on the central nervous system, including their salts, optical, positional, or geometric isomers, and salts of the isomers if the existence of the salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation.

    Diethylpropion

    Phentermine

    Pemoline, including organometallic complexes and chelates of pemoline.

    Cathine

    Some trade and other names:

    d-norpseudoephedrine

    (2) The administrator may except by rule any compound, mixture or preparation containing any substance listed in subsection (1) from the application of all or any part of this article if the compound, mixture or preparation contains 1 or more active medicinal ingredients not having a depressant or stimulant effect on the central nervous system and if the admixtures are in combinations, quantity, proportion, or concentration that vitiate the potential for abuse of the substances having a depressant or stimulant effect on the central nervous system.

    

History: 1978, Act 368, Eff. Sept. 30, 1978 ;-- Am. 1998, Act 319, Eff. Oct. 1, 1998 ;-- Am. 2010, Act 171, Eff. Oct. 1, 2010

PopularName Notes:

Act 368
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1982–2020 · leading case: Bloomfield Twp. v. Kane, 839 N.W.2d 505 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bloomfield Twp. v. Kane, 839 N.W.2d 505 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “7216, MCL 333.7218, and MCL 333.7220] in compliance with the administrative procedures act of 1969.”
People v. Pegenau, 523 N.W.2d 325 (Mich. 1994). · cites it 2× “But regulation in the case of schedule four substances, MCL 333.7218; MSA 14.15(7218), means an individual has a privilege by license or other means to possess certain drugs.”
People v. Rose, 324 N.W.2d 25 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “In case #57632, he appeals a judgment of probation violation and the sentences entered based on an underlying conviction of use of amylbarbitol, MCL 333.7218; MSA 14.15(7218). The basis of the probation violation was the attempted entry without breaking conviction.”
People v. Ham-Ying, 371 N.W.2d 874 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “On July 26, 1983, with approximately two months remaining on his suspension, defendant allegedly dispensed refill prescriptions of phentermine, a schedule 4 controlled substance, MCL 333.7218(3); MSA 14.15(7218)(3), to two former patients.”
People v. Joseph, 338 N.W.2d 727 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “15(7217) and MCL 333.7218; MSA 14.15(7218).”
People of Michigan v. Xun Wang (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “Catherine Reid, a consulting physician in the Office of Medical Affairs, testified that she had reviewed the videos taken of the appointments with Bates and Macon.”
People of Michigan v. Xun Wang (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “Catherine Reid, a consulting physician in the Office of Medical Affairs, testified that she had reviewed the videos taken of the appointments with Bates and Macon.”
People of Michigan v. Xun Wang (Mich. 2020). “See MCL 333.7218(1)(a). 4 Adderall is an amphetamine, a Schedule 1 controlled substance.”
in Re popiolek/jones Minors (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “Respondent-father also admitted going to a parenting-time visitation after “having drank some alcohol.” Respondent-father stated that he had been working 3 Klonopin is a trade name of the drug clonazepam, a benzodiazepine and Schedule IV controlled substance.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.7218(1)(a) — 3 cases
People of Michigan v. Xun Wang (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “Catherine Reid, a consulting physician in the Office of Medical Affairs, testified that she had reviewed the videos taken of the appointments with Bates and Macon.”
People of Michigan v. Xun Wang (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “Catherine Reid, a consulting physician in the Office of Medical Affairs, testified that she had reviewed the videos taken of the appointments with Bates and Macon.”
People of Michigan v. Xun Wang (Mich. 2020). “See MCL 333.7218(1)(a). 4 Adderall is an amphetamine, a Schedule 1 controlled substance.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.7218(3) — 1 case
People v. Ham-Ying, 371 N.W.2d 874 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “On July 26, 1983, with approximately two months remaining on his suspension, defendant allegedly dispensed refill prescriptions of phentermine, a schedule 4 controlled substance, MCL 333.7218(3); MSA 14.15(7218)(3), to two former patients.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.