Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 338.3721 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYER ORGANIZATION REGULATORY ACT


Act 370 of 2010


338.3721 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Michigan professional employer organization regulatory act".

History: 2010, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2011

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2019–2022 · leading case: Dept of Talent & Econ. Dev. v. Nbc Truck Equip (Mich. Ct. App. 2019).
Dept of Talent & Econ. Dev. v. Nbc Truck Equip (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “The Legislature, however, addressed this arrangement with the enactment of the Michigan Professional Employer Organization Regulatory Act, MCL 338.3721 et seq., see 2010 PA 370 , and the corresponding changes to MESA, see 2010 PA 383 .”
Dept of Talent & Econ. Dev. v. Great Oaks Country Club (Mich. 2021). “” 3 In 2011, the Legislature enacted the Michigan Professional Employer Organization Regulatory Act (the PEO Act), MCL 338.3721 et seq. The enactment of the PEO Act is significant not only because it interacts with the MESA in this case but also because the effective date of…”
Dept of Talent & Econ. Dev. v. Great Oaks Country Club (Mich. 2021). “” 3 In 2011, the Legislature enacted the Michigan Professional Employer Organization Regulatory Act (the PEO Act), MCL 338.3721 et seq. The enactment of the PEO Act is significant not only because it interacts with the MESA in this case but also because the effective date of…”
Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Tech. Ins. Co., Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2020). “) As a licensed Michigan PEO, AES is subject to the Michigan Professional Employer Organization Regulatory Act (“PEO Act”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 338.3721 et seq. (See Suppl.”
ABO Staffing Servs. Inc. v. UnitedHealthCare Ins. Co. (E.D. Mich. 2022). “See MCL 338.3721 et seq. . [or] Any Material Changes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.