Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 390.971 (2026)

State competitive scholarships; establishment; purpose.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

STATE COMPETITIVE SCHOLARSHIPS

Act 208 of 1964

390.971 State competitive scholarships; establishment; purpose.

Sec. 1.

State competitive scholarships are established by the state to foster the pursuit of postsecondary education and awarded to students showing promise of satisfactory completion of postsecondary study through competitive examinations and a continued satisfactory academic record in a course of study in an eligible postsecondary institution in this state.

History: 1964, Act 208, Imd. Eff. May 22, 1964 ;-- Am. 1979, Act 48, Imd. Eff. July 7, 1979

Compiler's Notes:

For transfer of authority, powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities of the Michigan higher education assistance authority, the Michigan higher education student loan authority, and the office of student financial assistance services in the department of education to the department of treasury, see E.R.O. No. 1995-2, compiled at MCL 12.181 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

For transfer of powers and duties of Michigan higher education assistance authority to department of treasury, see E.R.O. No. 2010-2, compiled at MCL 12.194.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1973–2003 · leading case: Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. State, 208 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. State, 208 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “208 of the Public Acts of 1964, as amended, being sections 390.971 to 390.980 of the Compiled Laws of 1948, or receiving tuition grants under the provisions of Act No.”

Becker v. Granholm, 272 F. Supp. 2d 643 (E.D. Mich. 2003). “§ 390.971 et seq. in 2001 and 2002, and was informed on June 11, 2002 that she qualified for the scholarship in 2003.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.