Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 390.991 (2026)

Tuition grants; establishment; purpose; qualifications.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TUITION GRANTS

Act 313 of 1966

390.991 Tuition grants; establishment; purpose; qualifications.

Sec. 1.

Tuition grants are established by the state to foster the pursuit of higher education by resident students enrolled in independent nonprofit colleges or universities in the state, which have filed with the board of education a certificate of assurance of compliance with title 6 of the civil rights act of 1964, Public Law 88-352, 77 Stat. 241, as in effect on January 1, 1966, whose instructional programs are not comprised solely of sectarian instruction or religious worship, and which are approved by the state board of education.

History: 1966, Act 313, Eff. Aug. 1, 1966 ;-- Am. 1976, Act 314, Eff. July 1, 1977 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 503, Eff. July 1, 1981

Compiler's Notes:

For transfer of authority, powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities of the Michigan higher education assistance authority, the Michigan higher education student loan authority, and the office of student financial assistance services in the department of education to the department of treasury, see E.R.O. No. 1995-2, compiled at MCL 12.181 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

For transfer of powers and duties of Michigan higher education assistance authority to department of treasury, see E.R.O. No. 2010-2, compiled at MCL 12.194.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1973–1973 · leading case: Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. State, 208 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. State, 208 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “313 of the Public Acts of 1966, as amended, being sections 390.991 to 390.997a *31 of the Compiled Laws of 1948, for or while in attendance at an institution of higher education, which received appropriations under this act, and is either convicted in a court of law of the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.