Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 4.14 (2026)
Secretary of state as secretary of commission; duties; election of chairman or co-chairmen; rules; compensation; expenses.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
COMMISSION ON LEGISLATIVE APPORTIONMENT
Act 46 of 1963 (2nd Ex. Sess.)
4.14 Secretary of state as secretary of commission; duties; election of chairman or co-chairmen; rules; compensation; expenses.
Sec. 4.
The secretary of state shall be secretary of the commission without vote and shall keep a public record of all its proceedings. He shall furnish, under the direction of the commission, all necessary technical services. The commission shall elect its own chairman or co-chairmen and make its own rules of procedure. The per diem compensation of the commission and the schedule for reimbursement of expenses shall be established annually by the legislature.
History: 1963, 2nd Ex. Sess., Act 46, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964 ;-- Am. 1971, Act 137, Imd. Eff. Sept. 29, 1971 ;-- Am. 1975, Act 53, Imd. Eff. May 20, 1975
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: Poly-Flex Constr., Inc. v. Neyer, Tiseo & Hindo, Ltd., 582 F. Supp. 892 (W.D. Mich. 2008).
Poly-Flex Constr., Inc. v. Neyer, Tiseo & Hindo, Ltd., 582 F. Supp. 892 (W.D. Mich. 2008). “See Am Comp, Ex A § 4.14. NTH contends that under Arizona choice-of-law rules, an Arizona state court would apply Michigan’s substantive law, MTD at 2 n.”
J & L Inv. Co., LLC v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 593 N.W.2d 196 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “Pyles v Goller, 109 Md App 71, 81; 674 A2d 35 (1996); Cuba v Hudson & Marshall, Inc, 213 Ga App 639, 639; 445 SE2d 386 (1994); 1 Corbin, Contracts (rev ed, 1993), § 4.14, pp 638-639. Placing property up for bid at an auction held “with reserve,” is considered an invitation, and…”
Poly-Flex Constr., Inc. v. Neyer, Tiseo & Hindo, Ltd., 600 F. Supp. 2d 897 (W.D. Mich. 2009). “See Am Comp, Ex A § 4.14. NTH contended that under Arizona choice-of-law rules, an Arizona state court would apply Michigan’s substantive law, MTD at 2 n.”
Gary Boike v. Patrick Green (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “” Warren Charter § 4.14(b). It is undisputed that plaintiff received the third highest number of votes in the November 2019 at- large city council race and that he was entitled to fill defendant’s seat under charter § 4.”
Gary Boike v. Patrick Green (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “” Warren Charter § 4.14(b). It is undisputed that plaintiff received the third highest number of votes in the November 2019 at- large city council race and that he was entitled to fill defendant’s seat under charter § 4.”
United States v. City of Troy (E.D. Mich. 2022). “, ZO §§ 4.14 C, D.4. But the ZO imposes different standards on certain uses (“use-specific standards”) that supersede general standards wherever that use is located.”
Homrich v. City of Wyoming (W.D. Mich. 2025). “, Charter § 4.14(b) (2025), https://perma.cc/LR89-MYA6.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 4.14(b) — 3 cases
Gary Boike v. Patrick Green (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “” Warren Charter § 4.14(b). It is undisputed that plaintiff received the third highest number of votes in the November 2019 at- large city council race and that he was entitled to fill defendant’s seat under charter § 4.”
Gary Boike v. Patrick Green (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “” Warren Charter § 4.14(b). It is undisputed that plaintiff received the third highest number of votes in the November 2019 at- large city council race and that he was entitled to fill defendant’s seat under charter § 4.”
Homrich v. City of Wyoming (W.D. Mich. 2025). “, Charter § 4.14(b) (2025), https://perma.cc/LR89-MYA6.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.