Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.56 (2026)
Repealed. 1995, Act 223, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE SOCIAL WELFARE ACT
Act 280 of 1939
400.56 Repealed. 1995, Act 223, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996.
Repealed. 1995, Act 223, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed section pertained to provisions applicable to aid to dependent children.
PopularName Notes:
Act 280Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1969–1986 · leading case: Evans v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 178 N.W.2d 173 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).
Evans v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 178 N.W.2d 173 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). “2 MCLA § 400.56 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 16.456).”
Morin v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 352 N.W.2d 325 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “Eligibility requirements for recipients of ADC are instead governed by MCL 400.56; MSA 16.456 and MCL 400.56g; MSA 16.”
Soto v. Dir. of the Michigan Dep't of Soc. Servs., 251 N.W.2d 292 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “This decision, in turn, had held that plaintiff’s initial application for Aid to Dependent Children (ADC), MCLA 400.56; MSA 16.456, was correctly denied on the basis that plaintiff was not a resident of Michigan at the time of application.”
White v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 174 N.W.2d 315 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). “MCLA § 400.56 subd. (e) [Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 16.”
Cornwell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 315 N.W.2d 150 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “Plaintiff Wandra Kegler had originally been receiving ADC and Medicaid benefits for the care of her dependent child, Andre Cornwell, pursuant to MCL 400.56; MSA 16.456, because the child’s father was absent from the home.”
Curry v. Dempsey, 520 F. Supp. 70 (W.D. Mich. 1981). “§ 400.56, and the state regulation, Mich.”
McKee v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 381 N.W.2d 679 (Mich. 1986). “, the Michigan Social Welfare Act, MCL 400.56; MSA 16.456, and the Michigan Administrative Code [1979 AC,] R 400.”
Just. v. Michigan, 377 N.W.2d 417 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “MCL 400.56; MSA 16.456. In 1977, plaintiff purchased a home in Detroit subject to a monthly mortgage payment of $188.”
Lopez v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 257 N.W.2d 143 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “20(a)(ll)(ii)(a); MCLA 400.56(c); MSA 16.456(c). 5 Unless information provided by the applicant in his application is controverted by information obtained by the department from other sources or by means of verification requests, the client “is the primary source of information…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.56(a) — 1 case
Evans v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 178 N.W.2d 173 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). “2 MCLA § 400.56 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 16.456).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.56(c) — 2 cases
Evans v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 178 N.W.2d 173 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). “2 MCLA § 400.56 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 16.456).”
Lopez v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 257 N.W.2d 143 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “20(a)(ll)(ii)(a); MCLA 400.56(c); MSA 16.456(c). 5 Unless information provided by the applicant in his application is controverted by information obtained by the department from other sources or by means of verification requests, the client “is the primary source of information…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.56(d) — 1 case
Evans v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 178 N.W.2d 173 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). “2 MCLA § 400.56 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 16.456).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.56(e) — 1 case
Evans v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 178 N.W.2d 173 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). “2 MCLA § 400.56 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 16.456).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.