Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 408.323 (2026)

Ski area safety board; creation; composition; qualifications; ex officio members.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SKI AREA SAFETY ACT OF 1962


Act 199 of 1962


408.323 Ski area safety board; creation; composition; qualifications; ex officio members.

Sec. 3.

    A ski area safety board consisting of 7 members is created within the office of the commissioner. The board consists of 3 ski area managers, 1 from the Upper Peninsula and 2 from the Lower Peninsula; 1 engineer with skiing experience; 1 member of the central United States ski association, a nonprofit corporation; 1 person with skiing experience from the Upper Peninsula representing the general public; and 1 with skiing experience from the Lower Peninsula representing the general public. The commissioner and an officer of the Michigan tourist council are ex officio members of the board without vote.

History: 1962, Act 199, Imd. Eff. June 7, 1962 ;-- Am. 1976, Act 364, Imd. Eff. Dec. 23, 1976

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of powers and duties of certain occupational functions, boards, and commissions from the Department of Licensing and Regulation to the Department of Commerce, see E.R.O. No. 1991-9, compiled at MCL 338.3501 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

    For the transfer of the ski area safety board to the department of licensing and regulatory affairs by type II transfer and the abolishment of the ex-officio seats of the commissioner and officer of the Michigan tourist council, see E.R.O. No. 2024-2, compiled at MCL 16.735.

TransferOfPowers Notes:

    See MCL 16.732.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–2016 · leading case: Civil Serv. Comm'n v. Dep't of Labor, 384 N.W.2d 728 (Mich. 1986).
Civil Serv. Comm'n v. Dep't of Labor, 384 N.W.2d 728 (Mich. 1986). · cites it 2× “365(3), Ski Area Safety Board, 1962 PA 199 , MCL 408.323; MSA 18.483(3), Toxic Substance Control Commission (department unclear), 1978 PA 116 , MCL 286.”
Trevor Rhoda v. Peter E O'Dovero Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 408.323. -7- We must interpret this provision within its statutory context.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.