Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 421 / Act 1 of 1936 (Ex. Sess.)
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 421.35 (2026)

Repealed. 2011, Act 269, Imd. Eff. Dec. 19, 2011.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ACT


Act 1 of 1936 (Ex. Sess.)


421.35 Repealed. 2011, Act 269, Imd. Eff. Dec. 19, 2011.

    Repealed. 2011, Act 269, Imd. Eff. Dec. 19, 2011.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed sections pertained to powers and duties of board of review and appeals to referees and board of review.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1971–1986 · leading case: Civil Serv. Comm'n v. Dep't of Labor, 384 N.W.2d 728 (Mich. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Civil Serv. Comm'n v. Dep't of Labor, 384 N.W.2d 728 (Mich. 1986). · cites it 4× “1977 PA 52 ; MCL 421.35; MSA 17.537. [85] Id. [86] Post, p 654.”
Smith v. Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 301 N.W.2d 285 (Mich. 1981). · cites it 2× “See MCL 421.35(1); MSA 17.537(1); MCL 421.36(3); MSA 17.”
Baker v. Gen. Motors Corp., 297 N.W.2d 387 (Mich. 1980). “40 1977 PA 52 ; MCL 421.35(3); MSA 17.537(3).”
Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers of Am. v. Governor, 202 N.W.2d 290 (Mich. 1972). · cites it 4× “53,295 decided July 26, 1972), and in addition alleged a violation of § 35 of the Michigan Employment Security Act (MESA); MCLA 421.35; MSA 17.537, relating to devotion of "full time to the functions of the board.”
State Bar of Mich. v. Galloway, 369 N.W.2d 839 (Mich. 1985). “Commission administrative employees make the initial determinations regarding eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits. MCL 421.”
In Re Schlossberg, 200 N.W.2d 219 (Mich. 1972). · cites it 3× “The statute controlling the appointment, qualifications and removal of members of that Board is MCLA 421.35; MSA 17.537. It provides: "Sec.”
Schlossberg v. State Bar Grievance Bd., 200 N.W.2d 219 (Mich. 1972). · cites it 3× “The statute controlling the appointment, qualifications and removal of members of that Board is MCLA 421.35; MSA 17.537. It provides: "Sec.”
Radke v. Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 194 N.W.2d 395 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). “Nonetheless, the appeal board, pursuant to MCLA 421.35; MSA 17.537, chose to remand the case back to the referee for the taking of additional evidence.”
Int'l Union v. Governor, 212 N.W.2d 814 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 2× “5b; and MCLA 421.35; MSA 17.537); and (3) in the event written consent for supplementary employment is obtained, the appointing authority must be kept continually advised of any changes in relation to the outside employment (CSR 1972, 8.”
Szypa v. Kasler Elec. Co., 355 N.W.2d 692 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “The employer sought review of the referee’s decision under MCL 421.35; MSA 17.537, which provides in part: "The board of review may on its own motion affirm, modify, set aside, or reverse a decision or order of a referee on the basis of the evidence previously submitted in the…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 421.35(1) — 1 case
Smith v. Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 301 N.W.2d 285 (Mich. 1981). “See MCL 421.35(1); MSA 17.537(1); MCL 421.36(3); MSA 17.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 421.35(3) — 2 cases
Baker v. Gen. Motors Corp., 297 N.W.2d 387 (Mich. 1980). “40 1977 PA 52 ; MCL 421.35(3); MSA 17.537(3).”
Smith v. Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 301 N.W.2d 285 (Mich. 1981). “See MCL 421.35(1); MSA 17.537(1); MCL 421.36(3); MSA 17.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.