Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 432.301 (2026)
Short title.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
LAWFUL INTERNET GAMING ACT
Act 152 of 2019
432.301 Short title.
Sec. 1.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "lawful internet gaming act".
History: 2019, Act 152, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 2019
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2021–2026 · leading case: Monique Jewell v. Mgm Grand Detroit LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
Monique Jewell v. Mgm Grand Detroit LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “This Court determined that the Lawful Internet Gaming Act (LIGA), MCL 432.301 et seq., provided the exclusive remedy for plaintiff’s common-law claims that were inconsistent with LIGA.”
Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC (Mich. 2025). “Defendant moved for summary disposition in the circuit court action, arguing that plaintiff’s claims were preempted by the Lawful Internet Gaming Act (LIGA), MCL 432.301 et seq., and that the MGCB had exclusive jurisdiction over all online gambling disputes.”
Waterford Redemption Ctr. LLC v. Gaming Control bd/Exec. Dir (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “Waterford Redemption Ctr LLC v Gaming Control Bd/Executive Dir, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered February 10, 2020 (Docket Nos.”
Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “116(C)(4), arguing that plaintiff’s claims were preempted by the Lawful Internet Gaming Act (LIGA), MCL 432.301 et seq., that the MGCB had primary jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims, and that plaintiff had failed to exhaust her administrative remedies.”
D Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “3 MCL 432.301 et seq. -1- Sands of the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division to plaintiff’s counsel, AAG Sands states: Thank you for speaking with us last month on the Davis v BetMGM matter and for the documentation you provided for our review.”
Monique Jewell v. Mgm Grand Detroit LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “This Court determined that the Lawful Internet Gaming Act (LIGA), MCL 432.301 et seq., provided the exclusive remedy for plaintiff’s common-law claims that were inconsistent with LIGA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.