Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 440 / Act 174 of 1962
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.1101 (2026)

Uniform commercial code; short title of act; heading of article.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.1101 Uniform commercial code; short title of act; heading of article.

Sec. 1101.

    (1) This act shall be known and may be cited as the "uniform commercial code".

    (2) This article shall be known and may be cited as the "uniform commercial code – general provisions".

History: 1962, Act 174, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 86, Eff. July 1, 2013

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 113 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1968–2026 · leading case: Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc., 81 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 239 (Mich. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc., 81 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 239 (Mich. 2013). · cites it 2× “Because actions on an account stated and actions on an open account are distinct and independent from the underlying transactions giving rise to 1 MCL 440.1101 et seq. the antecedent debt, neither action is governed by the four-year limitations period provided in § 2725 of the…”
Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc., 486 N.W.2d 612 (Mich. 1992). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] MCL 440.1101 et seq.; MSA 19.1101 et seq.”
Comput. Network, Inc. v. AM Gen. Corp., 696 N.W.2d 49 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “2d 17 (1986), this Court held that, where a limited express warranty fails of its essential purpose or deprives either party of the value of the bargain, the parties may pursue other remedies under the Uniform Commercial *55 Code (UCC), MCL 440.1101 et seq. Further, "[w]here a…”
Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Fin. Servs. Corp., 774 N.W.2d 332 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “We hold that, as a matter of law, Gencor made no express warranties to plaintiff. We further hold that plaintiff may not enforce any implied warranties that accompanied the initial sale of the Gencor machine.”
Liparoto Constr., Inc v. Gen. Shale Brick, Inc, 772 N.W.2d 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), MCL 440.1101 et seq., the purchaser of defective goods seeking to recover for economic loss and incidental and consequential damages must bring its action for recovery against the seller within four years of tender and delivery of the…”
Henry Ford Health Sys. v. Everest Nat'l Ins. Co., 927 N.W.2d 717 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “Of significance to this appeal, plaintiff asserted that the purported antiassignment clause was ambiguous, unenforceable in the context of a postloss assignment of the right to payment for past or presently due benefits, and void pursuant to provisions of the Uniform Commercial…”
Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co. v. Holly's, Inc. (In Re Holly's, Inc.), 140 B.R. 643 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1992). · cites it 2× “Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. §§ 440.1101 to 440.11102.”
Severn v. Sperry Corp., 538 N.W.2d 50 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “He alleged breaches of warranty under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), MCL 440.1101 et seq. ; MSA 19.1101 et seq.”
Catalina Mktg. Sales Corp. v. Dep't of Treasury, 678 N.W.2d 619 (Mich. 2004). “The UCC, found at MCL 440.1101 et seq., applies only to transactions in goods, not services.”
Hamade v. Sunoco, Inc., 721 N.W.2d 233 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). “See MCL 440.1101 et seq. See MCL 445.771 et seq.”
Fodale v. Waste Mgmt. of Michigan, Inc, 718 N.W.2d 827 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). “I concur with the majority’s conclusion that plaintiff waived his rights under the Uniform Commercial Code, MCL 440.1101 et seq., by acquiescing in defendant’s purchase of the collateral to satisfy the underlying debt obligation.”
Auto-Owners Ins. v. Chrysler Corp., 341 N.W.2d 223 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “To recover its loss, plaintiff brought its three-count complaint alleging: Count I, defendant Chrysler was negligent; Count II, defendant Chrysler breached the express and implied warranties arising under the Uniform Commercial Code, MCL 440.”
Show all 113 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.