Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 449.30 (2026)

Dissolution; partnership not terminated.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACT


Act 72 of 1917


449.30 Dissolution; partnership not terminated.

Sec. 30.

    (Partnership not terminated by dissolution). On dissolution the partnership is not terminated, but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.

History: 1917, Act 72, Eff. Aug. 10, 1917 ;-- CL 1929, 9870 ;-- CL 1948, 449.30

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1951–2024 · leading case: Rinke v. Rinke, 48 N.W.2d 201 (Mich. 1951).
Rinke v. Rinke, 48 N.W.2d 201 (Mich. 1951). “They direct attention to the provisions of CL 1948, § 449.30 (Stat Ann § 20.30), which reads as follows: “On dissolution the partnership is not terminated, but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.”
Commonwealth Capital Inv. Corp. v. McElmurry, 302 N.W.2d 222 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “MCL 449.30; MSA 20.30, which is identical to § 30 of the Uniform Partnership Act, provides: "On dissolution the partnership is not terminated, but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.”
In re Gibson, 67 B.R. 957 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1986). · cites it 2× “The basis of NBD’s motion was that the limited partnership was still in existence because it never wound up its business as required by Section 30 of the Uniform Partnership Act, Mich.Comp.Laws § 449.30; Mich.Stat.Ann. § 20.”
Wanderski v. Nowakowski, 49 N.W.2d 139 (Mich. 1951). “” (CL 1948, § 449.30 [Stat Ann § 20.30]). *209 “Sec. 42.”
FCB Assocs. LLC v. City of Ann Arbor, No. 366685 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2024). · cites it 2× “” MCL 449.30. During the winding-up period, the remaining partner winds up the partnerships affairs by dealing with the assets and liabilities accrued by the partnership.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.