Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.10s (2026)

Low-income and energy assistance programs; availability of federal funds.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION


Act 3 of 1939


460.10s Low-income and energy assistance programs; availability of federal funds.

Sec. 10s.

    The commission shall monitor the extent to which federal funds are available for low-income and energy assistance programs. If there is a reduction in the amount of the federal funds available to residents in this state, the commission shall conduct a hearing to determine the amount of funds available and the need, if any, for supplemental funding. Upon completion of the hearing, the commission shall prepare a report and submit it to the governor and the legislature.

History: Add. 2000, Act 141, Imd. Eff. June 5, 2000

PopularName Notes:

Customer Choice and Electricity Reliability Act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2012 · leading case: In re Detroit Edison Co., 296 Mich. App. 101 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
In re Detroit Edison Co., 296 Mich. App. 101 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “The PSC cites MCL 460.10s to support its argument' that the LIEEF remains a going concern.”
In re Consumers Energy Co., 279 Mich. App. 180 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “For example, MCL 460.10s requires the [PSC] to monitor the extent to which federal funds are available for low-income and energy assistance programs and, if there is a reduction in federal funds, to hold a hearing to determine the amount of funds available and the need for…”
In Re Consumers Energy Co., 756 N.W.2d 253 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “For example, MCL 460.10s requires the [PSC] to monitor the extent to which federal funds are available for low-income and energy assistance programs and, if there *258 is a reduction in federal funds, to hold a hearing to determine the amount of funds available and the need for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.