Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2507 (2026)

Optional services; authorization of end-user.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT


Act 179 of 1991


484.2507 Optional services; authorization of end-user.

Sec. 507.

    (1) A telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user's telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.

    (2) Upon the receipt of a complaint filed by a person alleging a violation of this section or upon the commission's own motion, the commission may conduct a contested case as provided under section 203.

History: Add. 2000, Act 295, Imd. Eff. July 17, 2000

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: In Re Complaint of Rovas Against Sbc, 754 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2008).
In Re Complaint of Rovas Against Sbc, 754 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2008). “" MCL 484.2507(1) provides that "[a] telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user's telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.”
Rovas v. SBC Michigan, 482 Mich. 90 (Mich. 2008). “” MCL 484.2507(1) provides that “[a] telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user’s telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2507(1) — 2 cases
In Re Complaint of Rovas Against Sbc, 754 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2008). “" MCL 484.2507(1) provides that "[a] telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user's telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.”
Rovas v. SBC Michigan, 482 Mich. 90 (Mich. 2008). “” MCL 484.2507(1) provides that “[a] telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user’s telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.