Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2507 (2026)
Optional services; authorization of end-user.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MICHIGAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
Act 179 of 1991
484.2507 Optional services; authorization of end-user.
Sec. 507.
(1) A telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user's telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.
(2) Upon the receipt of a complaint filed by a person alleging a violation of this section or upon the commission's own motion, the commission may conduct a contested case as provided under section 203.
History: Add. 2000, Act 295, Imd. Eff. July 17, 2000
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: In Re Complaint of Rovas Against Sbc, 754 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2008).
In Re Complaint of Rovas Against Sbc, 754 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2008). “" MCL 484.2507(1) provides that "[a] telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user's telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.”
Rovas v. SBC Michigan, 482 Mich. 90 (Mich. 2008). “” MCL 484.2507(1) provides that “[a] telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user’s telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2507(1) — 2 cases
In Re Complaint of Rovas Against Sbc, 754 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2008). “" MCL 484.2507(1) provides that "[a] telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user's telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.”
Rovas v. SBC Michigan, 482 Mich. 90 (Mich. 2008). “” MCL 484.2507(1) provides that “[a] telecommunications provider shall not include or add optional services in an end-user’s telecommunications service package without the express oral or written authorization of the end-user.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.