Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.2416 (2026)

Disapproval of filing; notice; waiting period.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956


Act 218 of 1956


500.2416 Disapproval of filing; notice; waiting period.

Sec. 2416.

    (1)  If within the waiting period or any extension thereof as provided in subsection (2) of section 2408, the commissioner finds that a filing does not meet the requirements of this chapter, he shall send to the insurer or rating organization which made such filing written notice of disapproval of such filing specifying therein what respects he finds such filing fails to meet the requirements of this chapter and stating that such filing shall not become effective.

    (2) If within 30 days after a special surety or guaranty filing subject to subsection (3) of section 2408 has become effective, the commissioner finds that such filing does not meet the requirements of this chapter, he shall send to the insurer or rating organization which made such filing written notice of disapproval of such filing specifying therein in what respects he finds that such filing fails to meet the requirements of this chapter and stating when, within a reasonable period thereafter, such filing shall be deemed no longer effective. Said disapproval shall not affect any contract made or issued prior to the expiration of the period set forth in said notice.

History: 1956, Act 218, Eff. Jan. 1, 1957

PopularName Notes:

Act 218
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1982–1982 · leading case: Attorney Gen. v. Ins. Comm'r, 323 N.W.2d 645 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982).
Attorney Gen. v. Ins. Comm'r, 323 N.W.2d 645 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “The commissioner formally disapproved the rate filing, pursuant to MCL 500.2416; MSA 24.12416, on the basis that: "(1) The association failed to give due consideration to factors mandated in Section 2403(l)(a) of the Michigan Insurance Code * * *; "(2) The proposed rates were…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.