Revised Statutes of 1846
R.S. of 1846
551.3 Incapacity; persons man prohibited from marrying.
Sec. 3.
A man shall not marry his mother, sister, grandmother, daughter, granddaughter, stepmother, grandfather's wife, son's wife, grandson's wife, wife's mother, wife's grandmother, wife's daughter, wife's granddaughter, brother's daughter, sister's daughter, father's sister, mother's sister, or cousin of the first degree, or another man.
History: R.S. 1846, Ch. 83 ;-- CL 1857, 3206 ;-- CL 1871, 4721 ;-- How. 6211 ;-- CL 1897, 8590 ;-- Am. 1903, Act 257, Eff. Sept. 17, 1903 ;-- CL 1915, 11364 ;-- CL 1929, 12692 ;-- CL 1948, 551.3 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 324, Imd. Eff. June 26, 1996
Notes of Decisions
Nat'l Pride at Work, Inc v. Governor, 748 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008).
· cites it 8× “MCL 551.3 [11] and MCL 551.4. [12] Although *536 there are, of course, many different types of relationships in Michigan that are accorded legal significance-e.”
People v. Armstrong, 536 N.W.2d 789 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 2× “Defendant also points to the marriage statute, MCL 551.3; MSA 25.3, as support for his argument that the Bliss definition is the proper definition of affinity.”
People v. Redden, 799 N.W.2d 184 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
“1 (restricting marriage to couples of opposite gender); MCL 551.3 (disqualifying couples who are of specified, close degrees of familial affinity).”
Commonwealth v. Rahim, 805 N.E.2d 13 (Mass. 2004).
“Acts 266 , § 3 (repealing criminal incest law); Mich. Comp. Laws § 551.3 (1981) (marriage prohibition); 1989 R.”
Nat'l Pride at Work, Inc v. Governor, 732 N.W.2d 139 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007).
“2 (marriage requires the consent of the parties); (3) each requires that the partner not be a blood relation; e/MCL 551.3; MCL 551.4 (listing blood relations that one cannot marry); (4) each requires that the partner not be married to another or have a similar relationship to…”
In re Toth Est., 212 N.W.2d 812 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).
· cites it 2× “MCLA 551.3; MSA 25.3 and MSA 551.4; MSA 25.”
Balodis, 17 I. & N. Dec. 428 (BIA 1980).
“428 Interim Decision #2805 The District Director noted that Michigan law precludes marriage between first cousins ( Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 551.3 ). Therefore, the District Director concluded that the petitioner and beneficiary are unable to conclude a valid marriage and the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.