Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 566 / Act 434 of 1998
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 566.42 (2026)

Principles of law and equity as supplemental provisions of act.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM VOIDABLE TRANSACTIONS ACT


Act 434 of 1998


566.42 Principles of law and equity as supplemental provisions of act.

Sec. 12.

    Unless displaced by the provisions of this act, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency, or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement the provisions of this act.

History: 1998, Act 434, Imd. Eff. Dec. 30, 1998 ;-- Am. 2016, Act 552, Eff. Apr. 10, 2017

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2015–2024 · leading case: Finley Grp. v. Working Media Grp. Atlanta, LLC (In re Redf Mktg., LLC), 536 B.R. 646 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Finley Grp. v. Working Media Grp. Atlanta, LLC (In re Redf Mktg., LLC), 536 B.R. 646 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2015). “Compare Mich. Comp. Laws § 566.42 (“This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘uniform fraudulent transfer act’.”
Gold v. Wall, Sr. (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2024). · cites it 6× “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 566.42 . 3. The Plaintiff’s position 46 Defs.”
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Larry Winget (6th Cir. 2022). “Mich. Comp. Laws § 566.42 . That means Chase can seek relief under both theories.”
Vulpina LLC v. Randy K Dzierzawski (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “Subsequently, Vulpina pursued the -1- fraudulent-transfer claim against Dzierzawski’s wife and Dzierzawski, alleging that Dzierzawski either never transferred his interest in Vinifera Wine Company, LLC to his wife or that the transfer was in violation of Michigan’s Uniform…”
20241115_C366683_40_366683.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “If [plaintiff] had known about the transfer, she could have stopped it and would still possess her financial interest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.