Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 570 / Act 497 of 1980
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201 (2026)

Repealed. 1010, Act 147, Imd. Eff. Aug. 23, 2010.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CONSTRUCTION LIEN ACT


Act 497 of 1980


570.1201 Repealed. 1010, Act 147, Imd. Eff. Aug. 23, 2010.

    Repealed. 1010, Act 147, Imd. Eff. Aug. 23, 2010.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed sections pertained to the homeowner construction lien recovery fund.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1987–2008 · leading case: Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, Inc, 732 N.W.2d 514 (Mich. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, Inc, 732 N.W.2d 514 (Mich. 2007). · cites it 2× “…home does not amount to specific authorization for residential builders to engage in residential home building. [18] MCL 570.1201.”
Erb Lumber, Inc v. Gidley, 594 N.W.2d 81 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “MCL 570.1201; MSA 26.316(201). In this case, it is undisputed that the Gidleys filed an affidavit pursuant to M.”
Church & Church, Inc. v. A-1 Carpentry, 766 N.W.2d 30 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See MCL 570.1201. The trial court granted summary disposition in the Doshis’ favor and discharged C & R’s lien, noting that because C & R did not address the statute of limitations argument, summary disposition based on the statute of limitations was appropriate.”
Dlf Trucking Inc v. Bach, 707 N.W.2d 606 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “” Erb Lumber, Inc v Gidley, 234 Mich App 387, 391 ; 594 NW2d 81 (1999), citing MCL 570.1201. Although plaintiff here is unable to recover from the fund, that inability is the product of plaintiffs failure to voluntarily become a member of the fund before providing the…”
Titanus Cement Wall Co., Inc. v. Watson, 405 N.W.2d 132 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 3× “MCL 570.1201; MSA 26.316(201). If, on December 1 of any year, the balance in the fund is less than one million dollars, the director of licensing and regulation may require an additional assessment up to $50 from each current member of the fund.”
Church & Church, Inc. v. A-1 CARPENTRY, 766 N.W.2d 30 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See MCL 570.1201. The trial court granted summary disposition in the Doshis' favor and *41 discharged C & R's lien, noting that because C & R did not address the statute of limitations argument, summary disposition based on the statute of limitations was appropriate.”
Horton v. Verhelle, 588 N.W.2d 144 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “MCL 570.1201(1)(a); MSA 26.316(201)(1)(a).”
Brown Plumbing & Heating, Inc v. Homeowner Constr. Lien Recovery Fund, 500 N.W.2d 733 (Mich. 1993). · cites it 2× “MCL 570.1201 et seq.; MSA 26.316(201) et seq.”
Erb Lumber Co. v. Homeowner Constr. Lien Recovery Fund, 522 N.W.2d 917 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994). “MCL 570.1201 et seq.; MSA 26.316(201) et seq.”
Abode Bldg. Materials, Inc v. Webster, 462 N.W.2d 806 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). “See MCL 570.1201; MSA 26.316(201). In light of these provisions, permitting Wickes to recover from the fund is highly unlikely to have an adverse affect upon the financial integrity of the fund.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201(1) — 1 case
Titanus Cement Wall Co., Inc. v. Watson, 405 N.W.2d 132 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “MCL 570.1201; MSA 26.316(201). If, on December 1 of any year, the balance in the fund is less than one million dollars, the director of licensing and regulation may require an additional assessment up to $50 from each current member of the fund.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201(1)(a) — 1 case
Horton v. Verhelle, 588 N.W.2d 144 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “MCL 570.1201(1)(a); MSA 26.316(201)(1)(a).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201(1)(b) — 1 case
Horton v. Verhelle, 588 N.W.2d 144 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “MCL 570.1201(1)(a); MSA 26.316(201)(1)(a).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201(1)(c) — 1 case
Horton v. Verhelle, 588 N.W.2d 144 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “MCL 570.1201(1)(a); MSA 26.316(201)(1)(a).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201(2) — 1 case
Titanus Cement Wall Co., Inc. v. Watson, 405 N.W.2d 132 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “MCL 570.1201; MSA 26.316(201). If, on December 1 of any year, the balance in the fund is less than one million dollars, the director of licensing and regulation may require an additional assessment up to $50 from each current member of the fund.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201(l)(a) — 1 case
Horton v. Verhelle, 588 N.W.2d 144 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “MCL 570.1201(1)(a); MSA 26.316(201)(1)(a).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201(l)(b) — 1 case
Horton v. Verhelle, 588 N.W.2d 144 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “MCL 570.1201(1)(a); MSA 26.316(201)(1)(a).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 570.1201(l)(c) — 2 cases
Dlf Trucking Inc v. Bach, 707 N.W.2d 606 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). “” Erb Lumber, Inc v Gidley, 234 Mich App 387, 391 ; 594 NW2d 81 (1999), citing MCL 570.1201. Although plaintiff here is unable to recover from the fund, that inability is the product of plaintiffs failure to voluntarily become a member of the fund before providing the…”
Horton v. Verhelle, 588 N.W.2d 144 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “MCL 570.1201(1)(a); MSA 26.316(201)(1)(a).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.