Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1611 (2026)

Venue; action on probate bond.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.1611 Venue; action on probate bond.

Sec. 1611.

    The county in which a probate bond is filed is a proper county in which to commence and try actions upon the bond.

History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Massey v. Mandell, 614 N.W.2d 70 (Mich. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Massey v. Mandell, 614 N.W.2d 70 (Mich. 2000). · cites it 2× “1629(1)(a)(i); MSA 27A.1629(1)(a)(i) provides that venue is proper in the county in which "[t]he defendant resides.”
Colucci v. McMillin, 662 N.W.2d 87 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “1605, which concerns venue for actions involving real property or tangible personal property, nor MCL 600.1611, which concerns venue for actions involving probate bonds, resolve the road commission’s motion for change of venue.”
Omne Fin., Inc v. Shacks, Inc, 573 N.W.2d 641 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “§ 600.1611; M.S.A. § 27A.1611, regarding actions on probate bonds; M.”
Angelucci v. Dart Props. Inc., 836 N.W.2d 219 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “1605, MCL 600.1611, MCL 600.1615, and MCL 600.1629], venue is determined as follows: (a) The county in which a defendant resides, has a place of business, or conducts business, or in which the registered office of a defendant corporation is located, is a proper county in which…”
Angelucci v. Dart Props. Inc., 828 N.W.2d 724 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “1605, MCL 600.1611, and MCL 600.1615 are inapplicable.”
Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v Nrk Rx, Inc (Mich. 2026). “Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP v Detroit, 505 Mich 284 , 295; 952 NW2d 358 (2020) (“Each word and phrase in a statute ‘must be assigned such 3 See MCL 600.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.