Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2501 (2026)

Fees; allowance.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961

Act 236 of 1961

600.2501 Fees; allowance.

Sec. 2501.

For the services mentioned in this chapter, hereafter done or performed in the several courts in this state, by the officers thereof, or in any proceeding authorized by law, the fees hereinafter prescribed shall be allowed.

History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: Joerger v. Gordon Food Serv., Inc, 568 N.W.2d 365 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Joerger v. Gordon Food Serv., Inc, 568 N.W.2d 365 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 600.2501 et seq.; M.S.A. § 27A.2501 et seq.”

Beach v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 550 N.W.2d 580 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “§ 600.2501 et seq.; M.S.A. § 27A.2501 et seq.”

Adair v. Michigan, 298 Mich. App. 383 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “and MCL 600.2501 et seq. The Court also recognized a reasonableness component to the costs awarded.”

J C Bldg. Corp. v. Parkhurst Homes, Inc., 552 N.W.2d 466 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “and MCL 600.2501 et seq.) MSA 27A.2501 et seq.”

Butler v. City of Newaygo, 320 N.W.2d 401 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “2504, however, the allowance of fees set forth in Chapter 25 of the Revised Judicature Act, MCL 600.2501 et seq.; MSA 27A.2501 et seq.”

Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. v. Esther Susin (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “” MCL 600.2501. Because Associated Adjusters is not an officer of the court nor was its appraisal a court proceeding or service, MCL 600.”

20231207_C359082_69_359082.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “, provides that the following items generally may be taxed as costs: (1) Any of the fees of officers, witnesses, or other persons mentioned in this chapter or in [MCL 600.2501 et seq.], unless a contrary intention is stated.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.