Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3110 (2026)
Foreclosure of interest or installment; payment before judgment.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.3110 Foreclosure of interest or installment; payment before judgment.
Sec. 3110.
Whenever a complaint is filed for the satisfaction or foreclosure of any mortgage on real estate or land contract, upon which there is due any interest or any portion or installment of the principal and there are other portions or installments to become due subsequently, the complaint shall be dismissed upon the defendant's bringing into court, at any time before the judgment of sale, the principal and interest due, with costs.
History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1968–1990 · leading case: Carpenter v. Smith, 383 N.W.2d 248 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).
Carpenter v. Smith, 383 N.W.2d 248 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “On the contrary, the act provides that a complaint in foreclosure "shall be dismissed upon the defendant's bringing into court, at any time before the judgment of sale, the principal and interest due, with costs".”
Kent v. Pipia, 462 N.W.2d 800 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). “MCL 600.3110; MSA 27A.3110 provides: Whenever a complaint is filed for the satisfaction or foreclosure of any mortgage on real estate or land contract, upon which there is due any interest or any portion or installment of the principal and there are other portions or…”
Dumas v. Helm, 166 N.W.2d 306 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968). “It reads: “Whenever a complaint is filed for the satisfaction or foreclosure of any mortgage on real estate or land contract, upon which there is due any interest or any portion or installment of the principal and there are other portions or installments to become due…”
Colby v. Tobba, Inc, 381 N.W.2d 411 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “MCL 600.3110; MSA 27A.3110. By making the payments, the court-appointed receiver was fulfilling his statutory duties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.