Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.3708 (2026)

Duty of personal representative; supplemental inventory.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE


Act 386 of 1998


700.3708 Duty of personal representative; supplemental inventory.

Sec. 3708.

    If property not included in the original inventory comes to the knowledge of a personal representative or if the personal representative learns that the value or description indicated in the original inventory for an item is erroneous or misleading, the personal representative shall make a supplementary inventory or appraisal showing the market value as of the date of the decedent's death of the new item or the revised market value or description, and showing the appraiser or other data relied upon, if any. The personal representative shall furnish copies or information of the supplementary inventory to persons interested in the new information, and shall file it with the court if the original inventory was filed or submit the information contained in the supplemental inventory to the court for recalculation of the probate inventory fee.

History: 1998, Act 386, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000

PopularName Notes:

EPIC
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2023 · leading case: in Re Warner Est. (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
in Re Warner Est. (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “These additional claims include Count VI (fraudulent misrepresentation of the decedent’s assets); Count VII (fraudulent concealment of the decedent’s assets); Count IX (neglect by petitioner of her duty to prepare an inventory in compliance with MCL 700.”
in Re Warner Est. (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “These additional claims include Count VI (fraudulent misrepresentation of the decedent’s assets); Count VII (fraudulent concealment of the decedent’s assets); Count IX (neglect by petitioner of her duty to prepare an inventory in compliance with MCL 700.”
In Re Piippo Est. (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 4× “3706 and MCL 700.3708. Moreover, appellant argued, she was the legal owner of a 1972 Ford Bronco located in the pole barn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.