Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5305 (2026)

Guardian ad litem; duties; compensation; legal counsel.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE


Act 386 of 1998


700.5305 Guardian ad litem; duties; compensation; legal counsel.

Sec. 5305.

    (1) The duties of a guardian ad litem appointed for an individual alleged to be incapacitated include all of the following:

    (a) Personally visiting the individual.

    (b) Explaining to the individual the nature, purpose, and legal effects of a guardian's appointment.

    (c) Explaining to the individual the hearing procedure and the individual's rights in the hearing procedure, including, but not limited to, all of the following:

    (i) The right to contest the petition.

    (ii) The right to request limits on the guardian's powers, including a limitation on the guardian's power to execute on behalf of the ward either of the following:

    (A) A do-not-resuscitate order.

    (B) A physician orders for scope of treatment form.

    (iii) The right to object to a particular person being appointed guardian or designated as standby guardian.

    (iv) The right to be present at the hearing.

    (v) The right to be represented by legal counsel.

    (vi) The right to have legal counsel appointed for the individual if the individual is unable to afford legal counsel.

    (d) Informing the individual that if a guardian is appointed, the guardian may have the power to execute a do-not-resuscitate order on behalf of the individual and, if meaningful communication is possible, discern if the individual objects to having a do-not-resuscitate order executed on the individual's behalf.

    (e) Informing the individual that if a guardian is appointed, the guardian may have the power to execute a physician orders for scope of treatment form on behalf of the individual and, if meaningful communication is possible, discern if the individual objects to having a physician orders for scope of treatment form executed on the individual's behalf.

    (f) Informing the individual of the name of each person known to be seeking appointment as guardian or designation as standby guardian.

    (g) Asking the individual and the petitioner about the amount of cash and property readily convertible into cash that is in the individual's estate.

    (h) Making determinations, and informing the court of those determinations, on all of the following:

    (i) Whether there are 1 or more appropriate alternatives to the appointment of a full guardian or whether 1 or more actions should be taken in addition to the appointment of a guardian. Before informing the court of the guardian ad litem's determination under this subparagraph, the guardian ad litem shall consider the appropriateness of at least each of the following as alternatives or additional actions:

    (A) Appointment of a limited guardian, including the specific powers and limitation on those powers the guardian ad litem believes appropriate.

    (B) Appointment of a conservator or another protective order under part 4 of this article. In the report informing the court of the determinations under this subdivision, the guardian ad litem shall include an estimate of the amount of cash and property readily convertible into cash that is in the individual's estate.

    (C) Execution of a patient advocate designation, do-not-resuscitate order, physician orders for scope of treatment form, or durable power of attorney with or without limitations on purpose, authority, or duration.

    (ii) Whether a disagreement or dispute related to the guardianship petition might be resolved through court ordered mediation.

    (iii) Whether the individual wishes to be present at the hearing.

    (iv) Whether the individual wishes to contest the petition.

    (v) Whether the individual wishes limits placed on the guardian's powers.

    (vi) Whether the individual objects to having a do-not-resuscitate order executed on the individual's behalf.

    (vii) Whether the individual objects to having a physician orders for scope of treatment form executed on the individual's behalf.

    (viii) Whether the individual objects to a particular person being appointed guardian or designated a standby guardian.

    (2) The court shall not order compensation of the guardian ad litem unless the guardian ad litem states on the record or in the guardian ad litem's written report that the guardian ad litem has complied with subsection (1).

    (3) If the individual alleged to be incapacitated wishes to contest the petition, to have limits placed on the guardian's powers, or to object to a particular person being appointed guardian or designated as standby guardian and if legal counsel has not been secured, the court shall appoint legal counsel to represent the individual alleged to be incapacitated. If the individual alleged to be incapacitated is indigent, this state shall bear the expense of legal counsel.

    (4) If the individual alleged to be incapacitated requests legal counsel or the guardian ad litem determines it is in the individual's best interest to have legal counsel, and if legal counsel has not been secured, the court shall appoint legal counsel. If the individual alleged to be incapacitated is indigent, this state shall bear the expense of legal counsel.

    (5) If the individual alleged to be incapacitated has legal counsel appointed under subsection (3) or (4), the appointment of a guardian ad litem terminates.

    

    

History: 1998, Act 386, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 464, Eff. June 1, 2001 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 210, Eff. Oct. 1, 2012 ;-- Am. 2013, Act 157, Eff. Feb. 3, 2014 ;-- Am. 2017, Act 155, Eff. Feb. 6, 2018 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 1, Imd. Eff. Feb. 21, 2024

PopularName Notes:

EPIC
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2022 · leading case: Kolley v. Adult Prot. Servs., 786 F. Supp. 2d 1277 (E.D. Mich. 2011).
Kolley v. Adult Prot. Servs., 786 F. Supp. 2d 1277 (E.D. Mich. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5305 (e). The allegations against Saltzman concern her court-ordered testimony and recommendations.”
in Re Conservatorship of Mary Janet Faulkner Huston (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 5× “On appeal, Terri-Lynn argues, citing MCL 700.5305 and MCL 700.5310, that a petition for modification of a conservatorship “follows the same procedure as an initial filing.”
In Re Richard Lee Conrad (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “Additionally, given that COVID restrictions have been lifted, the probate court is to direct the GAL to prepare an updated report after complying with the duties under MCL 700.5305(1), which include, among others, the duty to personally visit the individual.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5305(1) — 1 case
In Re Richard Lee Conrad (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “Additionally, given that COVID restrictions have been lifted, the probate court is to direct the GAL to prepare an updated report after complying with the duties under MCL 700.5305(1), which include, among others, the duty to personally visit the individual.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5305(1)(a) — 1 case
In Re Richard Lee Conrad (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “Additionally, given that COVID restrictions have been lifted, the probate court is to direct the GAL to prepare an updated report after complying with the duties under MCL 700.5305(1), which include, among others, the duty to personally visit the individual.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5305(1)(f) — 1 case
in Re Conservatorship of Mary Janet Faulkner Huston (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “On appeal, Terri-Lynn argues, citing MCL 700.5305 and MCL 700.5310, that a petition for modification of a conservatorship “follows the same procedure as an initial filing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.