Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.7504 (2026)

Spendthrift provision or support provision; exceptions; "child" defined.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE


Act 386 of 1998


700.7504 Spendthrift provision or support provision; exceptions; "child" defined.

Sec. 7504.

    (1) The interest of a trust beneficiary that is subject to a spendthrift provision, a support provision, or both may be reached in satisfaction of an enforceable claim against the trust beneficiary by any of the following:

    (a) A trust beneficiary's child or former spouse who has a judgment or court order against the trust beneficiary for support or maintenance.

    (b) A judgment creditor who has provided services that enhance, preserve, or protect a trust beneficiary's interest in the trust.

    (c) This state or the United States.

    (2) The court shall order the trustee to satisfy all or part of a judgment described in subsection (1) only out of all or part of distributions of income or principal as they become due.

    (3) Notwithstanding that the terms of the trust include a spendthrift provision, this section does not apply to the interest of a trust beneficiary that is subject to a discretionary trust provision.

    (4) As used in this section, "child" includes any person for whom an order or judgment for child support has been entered in this or another state.

History: 1998, Act 386, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2009, Act 46, Eff. Apr. 1, 2010

PopularName Notes:

EPIC
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Auto-Owners Ins. v. All Star Lawn Specialists Plus, Inc., 838 N.W.2d 166 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013).
Auto-Owners Ins. v. All Star Lawn Specialists Plus, Inc., 838 N.W.2d 166 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “In both the former EPIC provision, MCL 700.7504, as enacted by 1998 PA 386 , and the MTC, MCL 700.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.