Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 752.794 (2026)
Prohibited access to computer program, computer, computer system, or computer network.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
FRAUDULENT ACCESS TO COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER NETWORKS
Act 53 of 1979
752.794 Prohibited access to computer program, computer, computer system, or computer network.
Sec. 4.
A person shall not intentionally access or cause access to be made to a computer program, computer, computer system, or computer network to devise or execute a scheme or artifice with the intent to defraud or to obtain money, property, or a service by a false or fraudulent pretense, representation, or promise.
History: 1979, Act 53, Eff. Mar. 27, 1980 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 326, Eff. Apr. 1, 1997
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2023 · leading case: People v. Jemison, 466 N.W.2d 378 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991).
People v. Jemison, 466 N.W.2d 378 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “354(1), and two counts of computer fraud, MCL 752.794; MSA 28.529(4). Defendant was sentenced to five years’ probation, a suspended six-month prison term, and ordered to pay restitution.”
People of Michigan v. Jason Allen Tanis (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE Appellate counsel first argues that there was insufficient evidence to convict defendant of fraudulent access to computers, MCL 752.794. However, defendant was not convicted under that statute.”
People of Michigan v. Lidia Elena Talaba (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “PERTINENT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Police were called to a Secretary of State (SOS) office in Brownstown, Michigan after receiving a report that a man had changed his clothes in the parking lot and appeared to have secreted on his person a device from which wires protruded.”
People of Michigan v. Lidia Elena Talaba (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “PERTINENT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Police were called to a Secretary of State (SOS) office in Brownstown, Michigan after receiving a report that a man had changed his clothes in the parking lot and appeared to have secreted on his person a device from which wires protruded.”
20221229_C357544_49_357544.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “214, MCL 752.794, MCL 752.795, and MCL 752.796, and appears to suggest that Charles conspired with her to violate these statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.