Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 90.6 (2026)

Judgment or conviction; limitation on sanctions; costs.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE FOURTH CLASS CITY ACT


Act 215 of 1895


90.6 Judgment or conviction; limitation on sanctions; costs.

Sec. 6.

    Upon judgment or conviction, the court shall impose a sanction not exceeding the limit prescribed in the ordinance violated, as the nature of the case may require, together with such costs of prosecution as the court shall order. In a civil infraction action, the district court may assess costs as provided in section 907 of the Michigan vehicle code, Act No. 300 of the Public Acts of 1949, being section 257.907 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, or section 8727 of the revised judicature act of 1961, Act No. 236 of the Public Acts of 1961, being section 600.8727 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

History: 1895, Act 215, Eff. Aug. 30, 1895 ;-- CL 1897, 3094 ;-- CL 1915, 3008 ;-- CL 1929, 1932 ;-- CL 1948, 90.6 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 19, Eff. May 1, 1994

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2023 · leading case: Olga's Kitchen of Hayward, Inc. v. Papo, 108 F.R.D. 695 (E.D. Mich. 1985).
Olga's Kitchen of Hayward, Inc. v. Papo, 108 F.R.D. 695 (E.D. Mich. 1985). “Papo correctly points out that the equipment lease did not define “fair market value.”
Detroit v. Com. (E.D. Mich. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 90.6(b), this is not an appropriate circumstance to exercise such discretion, given the need to prioritize the agency's limited resources to prepare the forthcoming 2022 estimates, and to ensure that sufficient resources and program materials are available to support the…”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 90.6(b): 1 case
Detroit v. Com. (E.D. Mich. 2023). “§ 90.6(b), this is not an appropriate circumstance to exercise such discretion, given the need to prioritize the agency's limited resources to prepare the forthcoming 2022 estimates, and to ensure that sufficient resources and program materials are available to support the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.