Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 11.11 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1980 c 607 art 14 s 48]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2025 · leading case: McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church, 527 N.W.2d 830 (Minn. 1995).
McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church, 527 N.W.2d 830 (Minn. 1995). “Larson, The Laiv of Workmen’s Compensation, § 11.11(b) at 3-197 to 3-198 (1994) (footnote omitted).”
Atl. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Judd Co., 380 N.W.2d 122 (Minn. 1986). “Long, Law of Liability Insurance § 11.11 (1983). The sole authority which insurer relies upon in support of its argument that exclusion (p) precludes coverage of the claims against the insured is an Alabama case, Commercial Union Assurance Co.”
Select Comfort Corp. v. Baxter, 156 F. Supp. 3d 971 (D. Minnesota 2016). “See McCarthy on Trademarks § 11.11. In this action, Defendants contest the protectability of “Sleep Number” and “Number Bed.”
Bright Wood Corp. v. Bankers Stand. Ins. Co., 665 N.W.2d 544 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Long, Law of Liability Insurance § 11.11 (1983)). To qualify under the exclusion, the repair or replacement process must include more than product that has already failed; there is no withdrawal or recall where no attempt is made to prevent future failures.”
Schwan's Ip, LLC v. Kraft Pizza Co., 379 F. Supp. 2d 1016 (D. Minnesota 2005). “McCarthy on TRADEMARKS & Unfair Competition, § 11.11, at 11-16. Genericness can be demonstrated “from any competent source.”
Event Sales, Inc. v. TJX Companies, Inc. The (D. Minnesota 2025). “§§ 11.11–11.12. The Salvage Agreement also establishes a pricing schedule that depends upon the location of the merchandise and the method of delivery.”
— Minn. Stat. § 11.11(b) — 1 case
McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church, 527 N.W.2d 830 (Minn. 1995). “Larson, The Laiv of Workmen’s Compensation, § 11.11(b) at 3-197 to 3-198 (1994) (footnote omitted).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.