Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 112.34 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1990 c 391 art 10 s 4]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1964–2025 · leading case: Dahle v. Red Lake Watershed Dist., 354 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dahle v. Red Lake Watershed Dist., 354 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 112.34, subd. 1 (1982). Red Lake, however, contends section 112.”

Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed Dist., 153 N.W.2d 209 (Minn. 1967). “112 is stated in § 112.34, subd. 1, where it is provided: “In order to carry out conservation of the natural resources of the state through land utilization, flood control and other needs upon sound scientific principles for the protection of the public health and welfare and…”

Big Fish Lake Sportsmen's Club, Inc. v. State, Water Resources Bd., 400 N.W.2d 416 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 112.34 (1984) authorizes the Water Resources Board to establish watershed districts “to carry out conservation of the natural resources of the state through land utilization, flood control * * * for the protection of the public health and welfare and provident use…”

The Kelmar Corp. v. Dist. Court, 130 N.W.2d 228 (Minn. 1964). “112 and established for the purpose, among other things, of the conservation of natural resources of the state through “land utilization, flood control and other needs upon sound scientific principles for the protection of the public health and welfare and the provi *139 dent…”

Gayle's Marina Corp. v. Minnehaha Creek Watershed Dist., 451 N.W.2d 907 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 112.34, subd. 1. It is appropriate to look to the purposes of chapter 112 in reviewing decisions made under the act.”

In the Matter of Keystone Twp. v. Red Lake Watershed Dist., Paul Novacek, et ... (Minn. 2025). · cites it 2× “Laws 1232 , 1232–58 (codified as amended at Minn. Stat. §§ 112.34 et. seq). 8 including improvement proceedings.”

Buffalo Creek Watershed Dist. v. Minnesota Water Resources Bd., 188 N.W.2d 923 (Minn. 1971). “3, must be viewed in the light of the legislative declaration in § 112.34, subd. 1, that “conservation of the natural resources * * * through land utilization [and] flood control * * * for the protection of the public health and welfare” should be effectuated by watershed…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.