Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 123B.83 (2026)

Expenditure Limitations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.

[Repealed, 1Sp2005 c 5 art 1 s 55]

Subd. 2.Net unreserved general fund balances.

A school district must limit its expenditures so that its net unreserved general fund balance does not constitute statutory operating debt under section 123B.81.

Subd. 3.Failure to limit expenditures.

If a district does not limit its expenditures in accordance with this section, the commissioner may so notify the appropriate committees of the legislature by no later than February 15 of the year following the end of that fiscal year.

Subd. 4.Special operating plan.

(a) If the net negative unreserved general fund balance, calculated in accordance with the uniform financial accounting and reporting standards for Minnesota school districts, as of June 30 each year, is more than 2-1/2 percent of the year's expenditure amount, the district must, prior to January 31 of the next fiscal year, submit a special operating plan to reduce the district's deficit expenditures to the commissioner for approval. The commissioner may also require the district to provide evidence that the district meets and will continue to meet all high school graduation requirements.

Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, a district submitting a special operating plan to the commissioner under this clause which is disapproved by the commissioner must not receive any aid pursuant to chapters 120B, 122A, 123A, 123B, 124D, 125A, 126C, and 127A until a special operating plan of the district is so approved.

(b) A district must receive aids pending the approval of its special operating plan under paragraph (a). A district which complies with its approved operating plan must receive aids as long as the district continues to comply with the approved operating plan.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2007 · leading case: Educ. Minnesota-Greenway, Local 1330 v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 316, 673 N.W.2d 843 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004).
Educ. Minnesota-Greenway, Local 1330 v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 316, 673 N.W.2d 843 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 123B.83, subd. 4. ISD had statutory operating debt for several years, including at the beginning of the 2002-2003 school year, but the school board did not approve a five-year special operating plan to submit to DCFL until September 18, 2002.”
Black v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 316, 476 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (D. Minnesota 2007). · cites it 2× “K); see also Minn.Stat. § 123B.83. To comply with this directive, the District selected thirty positions for elimination, including one accounting clerk; because Black had the least seniority of the accounting clerks, her position was eliminated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.