Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 125. TEACHERS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 125.09 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1980–1996 · leading case: Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Bd. of Teaching, 545 N.W.2d 901 (Minn. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Bd. of Teaching, 545 N.W.2d 901 (Minn. 1996). · cites it 16× “The Board revoked Falgren’s licenses for engaging in immoral conduct under Minn.Stat. § 125.09, subd. 1(1) (1994). Both of these findings were based on the factual finding that Fal-gren engaged in nonconsensual sexual contact with I.”
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View, 518 N.W.2d 567 (Minn. 1994). · cites it 4× “, Minn.Stat. § 125.09, subd. 5 (1992) (school board members acting in good faith and with due care are immune for official actions under this section); Minn.”
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View, 498 N.W.2d 503 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “4(b) (1992) (social workers immune from civil and criminal liability if acting in good faith and exercising due care); Minn.Stat. § 125.09, subd. 5 (1992) (school board members immune for official actions done in good faith and with due care); Minn.”
Falgren v. State, Bd. of Teaching, 529 N.W.2d 382 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 10× “The Board determined that Falgren's conduct was immoral and, therefore, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 125.09, subd. 1(1) (1992). The parties attended a contested hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ) to determine whether Falgren's actions justified revocation of his…”
Mediterranean, Inc. v. City of Bloomington, 299 N.W.2d 742 (Minn. 1980). “Characterizing the fees paid during that period as an “overpayment,” the district court relied upon the refund authorization of the Bloomington City Code § 125.09 (1968), a provision generally applicable to licenses and permits issued by the city.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.