Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 169.141 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1996 c 455 art 1 s 11]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1984–1997 · leading case: State v. Pilla, 380 N.W.2d 207 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
State v. Pilla, 380 N.W.2d 207 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 10× “The trial court denied appellant’s motion and on July 31, 1985 found him guilty of violating Minn. Stat. § 169.141 (1984), a petty misdemeanor offense.”
State v. Host, 350 N.W.2d 479 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 8× “Appellant pleaded guilty to misdemeanor speeding, Minn. Stat. §§ 169.141 , 169.89 (1982). On appeal, appellant contests the constitutionality of the aggregation of his prior uncounseled petty misdemeanor speeding convictions which resulted in classification of the current…”
State v. Stone, 557 N.W.2d 588 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “24 (1996)); (6) speeding (Minn.Stat. § 169.141 (1996)); (7) driving with no seat-belt (Minn.”
State v. Batzer, 448 N.W.2d 565 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “FACTS On October 24, 1988, appellant was charged with driving 82 miles per hour in a 55 miles per hour zone, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 169.141 (1988). Ordinarily, this offense is a petty misdemeanor and would result in a maximum fine of $100.”
State v. Frandsen, 391 N.W.2d 59 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Wilson who subsequently stopped appellant and gave him a traffic citation for speeding in violation of Minn. Stat. § 169.141 . Trooper Kammen calculated appellant’s speed at 66.”
State v. Champion, 400 N.W.2d 185 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Kenneth Champion appeals from judgments of conviction entered against him upon findings of guilty on three petty misdemeanor offenses for speeding, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.141. Champion was arraigned on August 15, 1986 and appeared pro se.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.