Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 16B.59 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2006 [Renumbered 326B.101]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1994–2008 · leading case: City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2008).
City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 8× “The purpose of the code is to "provide basic and uniform performance standards, establish reasonable safeguards for health, safety, welfare, comfort, and security of the residents of this state and provide for the use of modern methods, devices, materials, and techniques which…”
State v. Arkell, 657 N.W.2d 883 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “2d at 489 (describing hazardous-waste laws as public-welfare statutes because they control conduct that pervasively threaten human health and safety); see also Minn.Stat. § 16B.59 (2000) (stating that State Building Code’s purpose is to “establish reasonable safeguards for…”
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks, 515 N.W.2d 97 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Any ordinance or regulation adopted by a local unit which differs from the uniform fire code must be directly related to the safeguarding of life and property from the hazards of fire, must be uniform for each class or kind of building covered, and may not exceed the applicable…”
Op. Atty. Gen. 125a (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1994). · cites it 2× “subject to a limited right of the people in certain counties to avoid its application ig Minn. Stat. §§ 16B.59. 16B-62, 16B.72 (1992)), we are inclined to construe section 16B.”
Op. Atty. Gen. 238i (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1996). “Any ordinance or regulation adopted by a local unit which differs from the uniform fire code must be directly related to the safeguarding of life and property from the hazards of fire, must be uniform for each class or kind of building covered, ana nra) not exceed the applicable…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.