Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 170. TRAFFIC ACCIDENT PROVISIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 170.05 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Superseded by Laws 1945, chapter 285]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1942–1971 · leading case: Chapman v. Davis, 45 N.W.2d 822 (Minn. 1951).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chapman v. Davis, 45 N.W.2d 822 (Minn. 1951). · cites it 16× “1941, § 170.05, is based upon a concept of residence as (a) a legal domicile, (b) an actual residence, or (c) a temporary abode.”
Panzram v. O'Donnell, 48 F. Supp. 74 (D. Minn. 1942). · cites it 7× “Defendant’s motions are based principally on these grounds: That Sections 170.05 and 542.09 of the Laws of Minnesota for 1941 violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution of the United States, Amend.”
Cooper v. Watson, 187 N.W.2d 689 (Minn. 1971). · cites it 2× “If no retroactive application was thereby effected, then the validity of service of the summons will be governed by § 170.05 (1941). Clearly, the 1949 amendment has no retroactive application.”
Hughes v. Lucker, 46 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 1951). · cites it 2× “The Chapman case is determinative herein as to the meaning of the term “nonresident,” in that § 170.”
Hinton v. Peter, 55 N.W.2d 442 (Minn. 1952). “1941, § 170.05 (which was similar to and superseded by § 170.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.