Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 171.25 (2026)
Enforcement; Delegation Of Authority
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The commissioner shall be charged with the responsibility for the administration and execution of this chapter.
Any duties required of or powers conferred on the commissioner under the provisions of this chapter may be done and performed or exercised by any of duly authorized agents.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1985–2013 · leading case: Askildson v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 403 N.W.2d 674 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
Askildson v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 403 N.W.2d 674 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Minn.Stat. § 171.25 (1986). There is a presumption as to the regularity and correctness of these administrative acts.”
Hintz v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 364 N.W.2d 486 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “It bears emphasizing that the determination to issue, revoke or cancel driving privileges rests with the Commissioner of Public Safety, Minn.Stat. § 171.25, not with the trial court.”
Gardner v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 423 N.W.2d 110 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Minn.Stat. § 171.25 (1986); Antl v. State, Department of Public Safety, 353 N.”
Thompson v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 567 N.W.2d 280 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “ISSUE Did the district court err in determining Thompson was not entitled to reinstatement of his school bus endorsement? ANALYSIS The decision whether to cancel a driver’s license endorsement rests with the Commissioner of Public Safety.”
Constans v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 835 N.W.2d 518 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). “§ 171.25 (2012). A presumption of regularity and correctness applies when license matters are reviewed.”
Stavlo v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 379 N.W.2d 669 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “The decision to cancel or deny driving privileges rests with the Commissioner of Public Safety, Minn.Stat. § 171.25 (1984), and there is a presumption of regularity and correctness to his administrative acts.”
Norman v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 404 N.W.2d 315 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “See Minn.Stat. § 171.25 (1984). The courts recognize this area as the Commissioner’s sphere of authority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.