Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 181B. PRIVATE PENSION BENEFITS PROTECTION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 181B.01 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 2001 c 7 s 91]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1976–2015 · leading case: Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus (1978). · cites it 2× “[1] Minn. Stat. § 181B.01 et seq. (1974). This is the same Act that was considered in Malone v.”
Malone v. White Motor Corp. (1978). · cites it 2× “A Minnesota statute, the Private Pension Benefits Protection Act, Minn. Stat. § 181B.01 et seq. (1976) (Pension Act), passed in April 1974, established minimum standards for the funding and vesting of employee pensions.”
Fleck v. Spannaus (Minn. 1977). · cites it 8× “1 By an order dated August 5, 1976, the Federal Court requested a resolution of the following three issues: “(1) Upon what date did the Minnesota Private Pension Benefits Protection Act, Minn. Stat. § 181B.01 et seq. (1974) (hereinafter the ‘Minnesota Pension Act') become null…”
White Motor Corp. v. Malone (D. Minn. 1976). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs have brought this action challenging the constitutionality of the Minnesota Private Pension Benefits Protection Act, Minn.Stat. § 181B.01 et seq. (1974) (hereinafter the “Minnesota Pension Act”).”
Fleck v. Spannaus (D. Minn. 1977). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs brought this action to contest the enforceability and constitutionality *646 of the Minnesota Private Pension Benefits Protection Act, Minn.Stat. § 181B.01 et seq. (1974) (hereinafter the Pension Act).”
Fleck v. Spannaus (D. Minn. 1976). · cites it 4× “MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiffs have commenced the above-entitled action challenging the enforceability and constitutionality of the Minnesota Private Pension Benefits Protection Act, Minn. Stat. § 181B.01 et seq. (1974) (hereinafter the Pension Act).”
Fleck v. Spannaus (D. Minn. 1976). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs have commenced the above-entitled action challenging the validity and enforceability of the Minnesota Private Pension Protection Act, Minn.Stat. § 181B.01 et seq. (1974) (hereinafter the “Minnesota Pension Act”).”
Graphic Packaging Corp. v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Pub. Accounts of the State of Texas & Ken Paxton, Attor (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “that the Private Pension Benefits Protection Act (Act), Minn. Stat. 181B.01 et seq., unconstitutionally impaired OUTCOME: The Court reversed the district court's the employer's contractual obligations to its employees judgment that upheld the constitutional validity of the under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.