Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 197.45 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1975 c 45 s 7]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1943–1990 · leading case: Koelfgen v. Jackson, 355 F. Supp. 243 (D. Minnesota 1973).
Koelfgen v. Jackson, 355 F. Supp. 243 (D. Minnesota 1973). “§ 197.45, better known as the Veterans' Preference Law.”
Minneapolis Fed'n of Teachers, Local 59 v. Obermeyer, 147 N.W.2d 358 (Minn. 1966). “43, which applies to state employees; the Veterans Preference Act, §§ 197.45 and 197.46; and the Public Employees Retirement Act, c.”
Carter v. Gallagher, 337 F. Supp. 626 (D. Minnesota 1971). “Minn.Stat. § 197.45(1). Plaintiffs brought the action as a class suit.”
State Ex Rel. Caffrey v. Metro. Airports Comm'n, 246 N.W.2d 637 (Minn. 1976). “48: “No provision of any subsequent act relating to any such appointment, employment, promotion, or removal shall be construed as inconsistent herewith or with any provision of sections 197.45 and 197.46 unless and except only so far as expressly provided in such subsequent act…”
State Ex Rel. Longman v. Kachelmacher, 96 N.W.2d 542 (Minn. 1959). “Since municipal civil service is involved here, § 197.45 applies. This latter section expressly provides that veterans who have been denied their veterans’ preference shall have an action for damages, and also the remedy of mandamus for righting the wrong.”
State Ex Rel. Sprague v. Heise, 67 N.W.2d 907 (Minn. 1954). “14 provides: “This chapter does not exclude or modify the application of sections 197.45 and 197.46, known as the veterans preference law.”
Fabio v. City of St. Paul, 126 N.W.2d 259 (Minn. 1964). “In addition, prior to the 1963 amendment, employees enjoying the benefits of the Veterans’ Preference Law, §§ 197.45, 197.46, and 197.47, have been expressly exempt from compulsory retirement.”
State Ex Rel. Niemi v. Thomas, 27 N.W.2d 155 (Minn. 1947). “1945, §§ 197.45, 197.46) he is entitled as a veteran to preference in tenure of the position and to enforce his right thereto, if any, by mandamus; that on March 5, 1946, the village council abolished the position; and that on the same day it let a contract to W.”
State Ex Rel. Stubben v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 141 N.W.2d 499 (Minn. 1966). “Nothing in sections 197.45 and 197.46 shall be construed to apply to the position of private secretary, teacher, superintendent of schools, or one chief deputy of any elected official or head of a department, or to any person holding a strictly confidential relation to the…”
Essling v. St. Louis Cnty. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 168 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. 1969). “43, which relates to civil service status of employees of state departments and agencies, and the Veterans Preference Act, §§ 197.45, 197.46, which relates to veterans’ preference in public employment.”
State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Serv. Comm'n, 91 N.W.2d 154 (Minn. 1958). “46, so far as is pertinent to this issue, provides: “* * * Nothing in sections 197.45 and 197.46 shall be construed to apply to the position of * * * or one chief deputy of any elected official or head of a department, or to any person holding a strictly confidential relation to…”
State Ex Rel. Verbon v. Cnty. of St. Louis, 12 N.W.2d 193 (Minn. 1943). “1941, §§ 197.45, 197.46 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. §§ 4368, 4369), and under the county civil service act, L.”
— Minn. Stat. § 197.45(1) — 2 cases
Koelfgen v. Jackson, 355 F. Supp. 243 (D. Minnesota 1973). “§ 197.45, better known as the Veterans' Preference Law.”
Carter v. Gallagher, 337 F. Supp. 626 (D. Minnesota 1971). “Minn.Stat. § 197.45(1). Plaintiffs brought the action as a class suit.”
— Minn. Stat. § 197.45(2) — 1 case
Koelfgen v. Jackson, 355 F. Supp. 243 (D. Minnesota 1973). “§ 197.45, better known as the Veterans' Preference Law.”
— Minn. Stat. § 197.45(3) — 1 case
Koelfgen v. Jackson, 355 F. Supp. 243 (D. Minnesota 1973). “§ 197.45, better known as the Veterans' Preference Law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.