Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 204. ELECTIONS, CONDUCT OF
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 204.11 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1975 c 5 s 135]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1961–2009 · leading case: Fitzgerald v. Morlock, 120 N.W.2d 339 (Minn. 1963).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fitzgerald v. Morlock, 120 N.W.2d 339 (Minn. 1963). · cites it 4× “” Section 204.11 provides in part as follows: Subd.”
Bell v. Gannaway, 227 N.W.2d 797 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 2× “*806 We think the legislature may well have had these practical considerations in mind in the enactment of § 204.11, subd. 4. [12] Affirmed. OTIS, Justice (dissenting).”
In Re Contest of Gen. Election, 767 N.W.2d 453 (Minn. 2009). · cites it 2× “4 (1974), which read, in relevant part, as follows: The voter and the ballots of any absent voter at any time before the ballots have been deposited in the ballot boxes are subject to a challenge by the judges or by any person who was not present at the time the voter procured…”
Munnell v. Rowlette, 145 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1966). · cites it 2× “* * *” Section 204.11, subd. 1, provides: “Having withdrawn from the voting booth with his ballots, the voter shall hand them to the judge in charge of the ballot boxes, and the judge immediately shall deposit each ballot in the proper box.”
Marshall v. Stepka, 108 N.W.2d 614 (Minn. 1961). “17 (now, with modifications, § 204.11, subd. 3), which provided in part: “* * * No voter, judge, clerk, or other person shall at any time place any mark as a means of identification under any ballot handed to or cast by any voter or upon any spoiled or discarded ballot except…”
In Re Contest of Gen. Election, 767 N.W.2d 453 (Minn. 2009). · cites it 2× “Bell was decided under Minn.Stat. § 204.11, subd. 4 (1974), which read, in relevant part, as follows: The voter and the ballots of any absent voter at any time before the ballots have been deposited in the ballot boxes are subject to a challenge by the judges or by any person…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.