Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 237.462 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2004 [Expired, 1999 c 224 s 7; 2004 c 261 art 6 s 3; 1Sp2005 c 1 art 4 s 117]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 2004–2009 · leading case: In Re Qwest's Wholesale Serv. Quality Standards, 702 N.W.2d 246 (Minn. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Qwest's Wholesale Serv. Quality Standards, 702 N.W.2d 246 (Minn. 2005). · cites it 30× “Qwest contends that the MPUC's only possible source for authority to order the self-executing payments comes from the MPUC's authority to impose administrative penalties under Minn.Stat. § 237.462 (2004), [5] which authorizes the MPUC to penalize knowing and intentional…”

Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Commc'ns, 618 F. Supp. 2d 1001 (D. Minnesota 2007). · cites it 14× “The MTA’s “Competitive enforcement; administrative penalty orders” section provides that “[njothing in [the] section affects the ability of a telephone company, telecommunications provider, telecommunications carrier, or subscriber to bring a private cause of action in court…”

In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Dep't of Com. for Comm'n Action Against AT & T, 759 N.W.2d 242 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 26× “(AT & T) challenges the determination by respondent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) that (1) switched-access services are local services and thus are not exempt from the provisions of chapter 237; (2) AT & T knowingly and intentionally violated state filing and…”

In Re Qwest's Wholesale Serv. Quality Standards, 678 N.W.2d 58 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 7× “1 (1998) (an agency "may not, under authority of rule, levy a total fine or penalty of more than $700 for a single violation unless the agency has specific statutory authority to levy a fine in excess of that amount") or Minn. Stat. § 237.462 , subd. 1 (2002), ("After a…”

Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corp., 555 F.3d 669 (8th Cir. 2009). “” Minn.Stat. § 237.462(11). However, subdivision 11 of section 237.”

Qwest Corp. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 427 F.3d 1061 (8th Cir. 2005). · cites it 5× “” Minn.Stat. § 237.462, subd. 9. MPUC asserts that this statutory framework supports a finding that MPUC possesses the express or implied authority to order restitution in this case.”

Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. (8th Cir. 2009). “” Minn. Stat. § 237.462 (11). However, subdivision 11 of section 237.”

— Minn. Stat. § 237.462(11) — 1 case

Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corp., 555 F.3d 669 (8th Cir. 2009). “” Minn.Stat. § 237.462(11). However, subdivision 11 of section 237.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.