Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 238.01 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 2004 c 261 art 7 s 29]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1980–1999 · leading case: Cable Commc'ns Bd. v. Nor-West Cable Commc'ns P'ship, 356 N.W.2d 658 (Minn. 1984).
Cable Commc'ns Bd. v. Nor-West Cable Commc'ns P'ship, 356 N.W.2d 658 (Minn. 1984). “” Minn.Stat. § 238.01 (1982). The Board is empowered to prescribe the procedures and practices municipalities must follow in granting franchises to cable companies, including minimum standards for inclusion in franchises.”
Carlson T v. v. City of Marble, 612 F. Supp. 669 (D. Minnesota 1985). “§§ 238.01, et seq. Jurisdiction is alleged under 28 U.”
In Re Dakota Telecomm. Grp., 590 N.W.2d 644 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). “See Minn.Stat. § 238.01 (noting statute created to “encourage areawide service * * * and discourage concentration of control and ownership”); see also 47 U.”
Lake Cable Partners v. Interstate Power Co., 563 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “…to "promote the rapid development of the cable communications industry responsive to community and public interest.” Minn.Stat. § 238.01 (1994).”
Minnesota Cable Commc'ns Ass'n v. Minnesota Cable Commc'ns Bd., 288 N.W.2d 721 (Minn. 1980). “” Minn.Stat. § 238.01 (1978). Minn.Stat. § 238.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.