Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 246.43 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1978 c 723 art 1 s 19; 1979 c 258 s 25]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1967–1985 · leading case: State v. Ward, 369 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. 1985).
State v. Ward, 369 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. 1985). “Appellant, Herbert Stanley Ward, pleaded guilty in 1975 to criminal sexual conduct in the second degree and was committed to the care of the department of public welfare (DPW) pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota’s Sex Offenders Act, Minn.Stat. § 246.43 (1978). 1 On September…”
Fritz v. State, 284 N.W.2d 377 (Minn. 1979). “The trial court after postconviction proceedings determined as a matter of law: “The Commissioner of Public Welfare, by transferring petitioner to Minnesota State Prison when such transfer would not be according to petitioner’s needs, has acted contrary to Minn.Stat. § 246.43. *…”
State v. Waldon, 287 N.W.2d 628 (Minn. 1979). “” Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 246.43, subd. 6 (1978), he was accordingly committed to the *630 security unit of the St.”
Krominga v. State, 311 N.W.2d 858 (Minn. 1981). “Peter pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 246.43 (1978), 1 the trial court, rejecting a recommendation to commit petitioner to the custody of the Commissioner of Public Welfare for treatment, sentenced petitioner to 20 years in prison for the kidnapping.”
Chonis v. State, 177 N.W.2d 810 (Minn. 1970). “1961, § 246.43, and contemporaneously ordered a presentence investigation by the Department of Corrections.”
State v. Zuehlke, 273 N.W.2d 658 (Minn. 1978). “For the- aggravated rapes occurring on December 4 and 28, 1972, the court imposed maximum terms of 30 years each but put defendant on probation on condition that he seek outpatient care as required by § 246.43. For the aggravated assault which occurred on January 24,1973, the…”
State v. Bauer, 288 N.W.2d 16 (Minn. 1980). “Did the trial court correctly apply the Sex Offenders Act, Minn.Stat. § 246.43 (1976), 1 in sentencing the appellant? The 10-year-old female victim was a member of a family which had long been friends with defendant and his wife and family.”
State v. Pooley, 153 N.W.2d 143 (Minn. 1967). “” The trial court observed the requirements of § 246.43. Defendant’s contention that the trial court should have construed the mental report as requiring specialized treatment, even though the commissioner refused to recommend such treatment, is without merit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.